Advertisement
*
Reproduction permitted for personal use only. For reprints and reprint permission, contact reprints@wistechnology.com.

Human cloning plans get blessing from British government

First Dolly, now human embryos.

This week’s announcement out of King’s College London that Professor Ian Wilmut, who cloned Dolly the sheep, has been granted a license by the British government to clone human embryos is sure to spark fresh hopes among disease sufferers, scientists and advocacy groups for a cure to such diseases as Parkinson’s and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS).

These diseases could be addressed through research on stem cells, which Wilmut will be extracting from the embryos and growing into motor neurons.

But the scientific community “has a long, long way to go in terms of motor neuron disease,” said Su-Chun Zhang, the UW-Madison researcher whose team recently was the first to coax embryonic stem cells to become motor neurons.
Wilmut and Paul de Sousa of Scotland’s Roslin Institute, with King’s College London researcher Christopher Shaw, have been granted a license by the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority to generate stem-cell lines to study motor neuron disease (MND). The team plans to clone embryos to generate stem cells that will in turn become motor neurons with MND-causing gene defects. By turning the cells into neurons, the team hopes to discover what causes the cells to degenerate.

To generate stem cells in the laboratory, Wilmut’s team will grow skin or blood cells from people who have an inherited form of MND of unknown genetic cause, a King’s College release said. They will then remove the genetic information from an unfertilized egg and replace it with the nucleus of a cell from a familial MND patient. Eggs that have successfully received the nucleus containing the MND-causing gene defect will be encouraged to grow up to the 200-cell stage. The embryonic stem cells will be removed, grown and directed to become motor neurons using a cocktail of growth factors.
Advertisement
One early hope for stem cell research was the potential for developing tissues for transplantation that would not be rejected by the recipient’s body, and any use of therapeutically cloned embryos for stem cells used to that end is reasonable, Zhang said.

But Zhang warned that that there are “scientific questions [as to] whether motor neuron disease is caused only by defects in motor neuron cells,” and that problems in other cells also may be responsible for degeneration.

“I’m not sure about motor neuron disease, in particular. There are a lot of questions surrounding this particular disease,” Zhang noted. “For motor neuron disease, I actually have some reservations about that.”

On the positive side, Zhang believes that using stem cells transplantation of tissue to stave off rejection by the body is a very reasonable use of therapeutic cloning.

Shaw contends that the project “is potentially a big step forward for MND research. We have spent 20 years looking for genes that cause MND, and to date we have come up with just one gene. We believe that the use of cell nuclear replacement will greatly advance our understanding of why motor neurons degenerate in this disease, without having to first hunt down he gene defect.”

Zhang noted that one difficulty in targeting motor neuron diseases is that once a patient is diagnosed, it takes “quite a bit of time” to establish a line of stem cells, differentiate them into motor neurons and then put them back into the spinal cord of a patient.

“At this point, we have not even figured out if cells put into the brain or spinal cord will survive,” let alone if they can travel to the affected muscle tissue and reattach, Zhang said.

“Motor neurons are especially tough,” he added. “This disease progresses so fast.”

To his critics, Wilmut maintains that his research in no way is intended to create fully developed human clones.

“This is not reproductive cloning in any way,” said Wilmut. “The eggs we use will not be allowed to grow beyond 14 days. Once the stem cells are removed for cell culture the remaining cells will be destroyed. The embryonic stem cells that we derive in this way will only be used for research into motor neuron disease.”

Zhang said he believes the pertinent laws in the UK are reasonable but urged caution all the same.

“I think we have to set up some very stringent guidelines on how to work on these therapeutically cloned stem cells,” Zhang said. “The cloning of human beings absolutely should be banned.”

Lincoln Brunner is a WTN contributing editor and can be reached at lincoln@wistechnology.com.

Comments

Bill Smarr responded 5 years ago: #1

Hey WE DON't HAVE ANY BUSINESS (PLAYING GOD) JUST WHO IN HELL GAVE YOU THE RIGHT TO CLONE HUMANS >>NO MORE NEVER AGAIN

Mark Nelson responded 5 years ago: #2

I applaud their efforts, being a member of a family with two cases of MNDs. Cheers to the British!

Ani Black responded 5 years ago: #3

I think using science in this respect is a great step forward in the battle against any disease. It is so easy for people to point fingers and rave - yet do these people suffer from these ailments?

Katie McCargo responded 5 years ago: #4

I think it is a long waited positive decision to move forward and help humans that are trapped in a sick body, yet existing in a world where they are forgotten because they can not function on like the so called normal people or our society. If God left them alive, could it not be for this reason. People that disagree with this wonderful discovery clearly do no have anyone at stake. And they can not invision the pain and suffering that both the diseased person and their love ones live daily.

Educated responded 5 years ago: #5

Obviously, the chistians ignoramus' below have never suffered from any disease. This is a great and obvious step forward. You can't label everything you don't understand "playing with God".

joe k. responded 5 years ago: #6

Its the ignorant people that don't understand all the amazing benefits of cloning human embryos... its not about cloning humans (and making legions of cloned soldiers)... its about cloning the human embryo to try to fix certain genetic problems.... get informed before you push your ignorance on us intelligent folk.

george b responded 5 years ago: #7

Anyone who knows the pain of disability will understand why this is a good thing.

IDidnt Vote4W responded 5 years ago: #8

Nice work UK! Good luck on finding innovative cures!

Scott Goodman responded 5 years ago: #9

Well, It just shows that the U.S. is going to be left behind in the dust when it comes to saving human lives. When it comes to war, we are experts.
Cheers.

Jennie responded 5 years ago: #10

Ignorance will always play a role and unfortunately that is our reality. At first, I would of agreed with the first responses I read above, but after having read all, my thoughts completely changed. I do understand how cloning can better the lives of the unfortunate that have to deal with such diseases that affect their lives. Having seen the suffering within my own family and friends I see this as a positive discovery. Also, as a young Christian, I believe in my heart that God brought forth these intelligent people to one day discover these cures and therefore cure our sick and much needed society. Right on UK!

Jason Segal responded 5 years ago: #11

. . .So the majority on the right wants to ban cloning because they're afraid cloned embryos will be killed (just one more type of abortion), and the left-wingers want the same thing because they are terrified of the idea that someone might let a clone live and mature (they never seem to like the idea of having to provide their entitlements to more human beings). You know there's something wrong with a course of action when the bromides of both sides favor it. . .

Prakash Donda responded 5 years ago: #12

This is great, and don't be stupid if you are not a scientist or don't have a clue. If they haven't played god lots of ppl die of diseases. So shut ur hole and pray to god that these experiments will be sucessful.

Flintstone responded 5 years ago: #13

Human cloning...I dont know about, i can see why we would need to clon say a heart, but a complete person.
There was Dolly1,2,3 etc before they got Dolly right. I dont know if i would like to be Flintstone1,2,3.
Imagine the defects we would cause.

Dick Sizzler responded 5 years ago: #14

Playing God? I guess we shouldn't have invented the wheel, or be allowed to practice medicine either... Grow up, morons.

someone responded 5 years ago: #15

its probably bad for humanity to research this stuff. If we do, eventually someone will start cloning humans fully developed

For Instance responded 5 years ago: #16

Nobody can recover - if its his or her fate. Deseases will show up in future and we will not be able to do something effective.
I don't believe in THIS, despite I believe in Medicine.

Jon responded 5 years ago: #17

To the people on top. I am a devote christian and believe that if properly regulated this can lead to great breakthrows. And what if they do clone a human. My guess is the clone won't survice very long anyway like our favorite Dolly. I have a friend that is paralyzed from the waist down. If Zhang can regenerate a spinal cord for him using cloned cells, more power to him. God gave us brains to use them for the benefit of mankind.

Chris responded 5 years ago: #18

Let the religious pray to God, and the sick to doctors and science.

Mike responded 5 years ago: #19

Using stem cells is the answer to some disease (including MND) and solving the shortage of much needed organs. I do not believe, however, that there should be race of "designer" human beings. Jumping headlong into scientific breakthroughs is not a good thing. Many things that we think can help us turn around to be more detrimental than helpful (abestoes, for example). The political, economic, religious ramifications are too much to be gauged.

Lavana responded 5 years ago: #20

Disease: see it; touch it; feel it. About G-d, it is all on faith. We might b eon our own here. Go for it, UK!

someguy responded 5 years ago: #21

I believe that this type of research could potentially help alot of people, and I support it. However, sometimes I just wonder if for all of our invention and moving forward to help we don't end up solving more problems than we create.

VA responded 5 years ago: #22

Any move which promises cures to diseases, cannot be stopped. It is only fair that people suffering from incomprehensible diseases be given a ray of hope through medical breakthroughs. Try as they might, the nay-sayers will fade into oblivion, as hope and the promise of life will always triumph.

Skippy Pinwheel responded 5 years ago: #23

Shut up bonehead. Playing God? If you mean using the brains that God gave us to figure stuff out that leads to this kind of science. If your god is so all knowing, she'd know this day was coming...so maybe it's cool with the diety (whatever it turns out to be.)

punch em responded 5 years ago: #24

"Zhang said. “The cloning of human beings absolutely should be banned.”"

Every experiment on healthy human beings is a sin, no doubt.

A Koren responded 5 years ago: #25

God is the creator, and man was created in god's image. Thus, man has the right (the obligation!) to create. It is "natural" for man to discover the natural resources given to him and to evolve accordingly. Like with every advancement in technology, a moral advancement must also coincide. Just like guns should not be used to murder, but only in self defense, this new technology should be used to save lives and improve the human condition, and not to create "baby farms". the choice is up to us.

Reuben responded 5 years ago: #26

This is abright idea, and guess thinking in the right direction!
But I would suggest that the scientific expertise be channeled towards finding the cure for HIV/AIDS first.
This is the worst calamity that has ever hit mankind. Its devastating effects are a nightmare especially in the third world and developing countries.
Am fearing that humankind might become extinct in the near future!

Dave responded 5 years ago: #27

So we can now 'create' millions of people and use them to save a few. Bring on euthanasia so we can have compulsory organ donation to save thousands :( Is one life more important than another. The thought tha t 'I am suffering so anything is worht it to save me' is so selfish

Shiva responded 5 years ago: #28

I dont know much about coloning. but i cheers those great scientist who paved the way for this. but the same scientist should use their brain to make a good landing...not to causes any mess. Anyway Good Luck for a better landing..:-)

JY Jelly responded 5 years ago: #29

God made us with brains that God intended to evolve, explore and invent. Scientists are doing work God granted them the ability to do.

Why would God create a world where things like this could happen if they weren't suppose to? All you GOD people are constantly looking to shoot down God's own invention.

I wonder if you same GOD freaks are asking the same 'who are you to play God' question to George W. Bush, who, under the name of God when out and blew away more than a few thousand people in the past three years.

bomber responded 5 years ago: #30

Come on people, this research is a must for modernized science.
Not only will we learn what causes these diseases, but there is
great hope that one day, in the near future, we might even be
able to.
This junk about the human race coming to an end, and us playing
god is immature, and even more uneducated. The benefits out-
weigh the risk. And singling out a whole religon because you don't
agree with its views is childish

I read somewhere that everyone thought Magellen was a nut, and
that the earth couldn't be a sphere, it was flat.

responded 5 years ago: #31

Obviously the article has nothing to do with cloning fully developed homo-sapiens. These posts for the most part are off topic. So, I'll bite.

Lets say the world's societies allow for the development of cloned, fully developed humans. Whoopeed freakn' doo. Yes, there would be a possibilty of competition in society between engineered and non-engineered humans for certain rolls. Its not like our societies have not dealt with these types of situations before. Besides, it does not matter either way, the worlds population will converge on whatever works.

Other concerns, such as individualism declining is also of minor concern. The common traits converged upon for a engineered human are of a small domain, the physical nature of the human. If your are concerned about individualism you might want to be more worried about the progression of information theory. Largely how to combat the disregard for education of the populace and the one-to-many information mediums being controlled by the select few. These ARE the large contributors to the reduction of the intellectual. where true individualism resides.

Now, with all that said, it is possible not see problematic side-effects with new technology. I will concede on that point.

One last thing, something that seems to always go unmentioned. Lets assume a technology brings about the end of the human species as we know it. Why does it seem most people have some self-rightousness notion that the human race deserves to propogate at the expense of the rest of the universe? Even if the human race could claim a history that was conducive to a productive environment for the rest of the universe, it still is self-proclaiming itself as a species.

David M responded 5 years ago: #32

This step is a great for humanity.

mikep responded 5 years ago: #33

Cloning go for it. Yes my family would benifit. Though it may not be my generation or myself personally I can at least assist science and medicine while asking what if something goes wrong. I reserve the right to change my views based on new knowledge. Here in America we seem to have an (un)mature (pre immaturity) view of the role of religion in life. We are not yet ripe for a refomation but can you picture a have religion-have not civil war. With nukes?

JohnnyB responded 5 years ago: #34

What exactly is wrong with Adult stem cells? Last I heard they worked also, avoiding the whole abortion aspect that seems to divide a large segment on this issue.

Molly responded 5 years ago: #35

I think a point of consideration is that what is being cloned is technically a blastocyst. That is, an embryo is not labeled until a later stage. Those that oppose this mistakenly confuse this issue. Also, consider that this blastocyst has no brain, no organs, no limbs, and no nerves, and no body parts. It is composed of 200 undifferentiated cells. I do understand that people who oppose this may take the position of "ensoulment," or the soul going into the DNA at conception. That is understandable and dates back to the very early Chistian beliefs, even pre-Christ. But do not argue slippery slope positions that have been proven wrong again and again; e.g. birth control, medicine. Finally, one need only to go back a few years to the advent of invitro fertilization, where the very same criticisms were proposed. Now over 100,000 new lives owe to this technology EACH YEAR (look one of these people in the eyes and say that God did not mean you to be here). Consider this: If your baby or young child was suffering greatly and dying of a degenerative disease, and the doctors proposed taking a cell of his/her body and "cloning" it to the blastocyst stage to remove stem cells to save his/her life, would you say no based on ethical grounds? Do not argue a sterile position - even a religious one - without truely putting yourself in this place.

BOb responded 5 years ago: #36

I bet if you had ALS or Parkinsons, you would be happy!~

Timmay responded 5 years ago: #37

So what exactly is the plan, to clone a human and then use that human as an organ farm?

Aunt Tillie responded 5 years ago: #38

I hope not. That would be wrong.

Time Traveller responded 5 years ago: #39

I have returned from the future to ease your worries. In the centuries ahead, we have harnessed the power of cloning to produce atheists with excellent spelling and grammer abilities, and so have wiped out the old plague of illiterate-dogmatic ranting on internet postings.

We are now engaged in a massive engineering project to build an evacuation spacecraft with room for the entire human race, as our sun is expanding and will soon consume the earth and inner planets. There doesn't seem to be any opposition to this life-saving possibility.

Sleep well ancient humans; the shackles will eventually loosen.

Time Stay-at-home responded 5 years ago: #40

Sounds good! Until then, I'll chill out watching LOST and Alias. :)

durita F. Sanders-Campfield responded 5 years ago: #41

Why do you need to clone anything. If you let the people - who may actually cure the diseases - the unsung heroes and heoines - the cloning mess - which has become a science like evolution (people actually base their careers on Darwin's theory) ( and get paid). I believe the traditional scientists and medical persons are afraid that alternative medicines will and can cure diseases. I wlill refuse to allow such things on God's earth. Cloning is for the heretics of our day. and I will say this to your face.

Someone responded 5 years ago: #42

it sort of depends if you know someone that has a horrible disease on what you think about this cloning stuff.

Let's See responded 5 years ago: #43

God is all knowing and created us in his image. Surely
he knew (and gave us this capacity) we would work
to make the world a better place. I am also sure he gave us the wisdom to successfully manage the great things
science will accomplish.

k.Varma responded 5 years ago: #44

there is no greater news when you have somebody dear who is is waiting for cure.

inam responded 5 years ago: #45

For every one of the attmepts that have been made to clone animals sheep or make desiner babies have no doubt about it theer have been of time that cloneing or making desiner babie that have not benn sucessfull. When cloning happens babies just arent made from nothing it happens by gods permission god allows it or god gives permission fot that baby for that baby to be born even though in cases where u try messing arond with the babies changing the clour of their eye or cloning them which will make them have defects that will make the babies different form those that have been born witHout the intervention of man. Mankind blames god and says HOW CAN GOD ALLOW SUFFEREING IN SOUTH AFRICA ETCLET ME TELL U IS IT GOD WHO IS LAYING OUT TARRIFS ON CROPS THAT MAKES THESE PEOPLE POOR OR IS IT GOD WHOS BOMBING IRAQ SO DONT YOU BLAME GOD . aNOTHER THING IF YOU LOOK BACK AT HISTORY POEPLE HAVE BEEN FOOLING US SINCE DAY just look back at history it tells u what has happened for instance the church the treaties they have made up and all the oter things that they try tricking us with like the doctrine of trinty look at history it tells You that it was the church that made the trinity up and and saying jesus was the son of god when infact he wasnt and did not say that .dont say that it says in the bible becuse it doenst go get the bible that is in hebrew one of the erliset ones nowherwedoes it say jesus is the son of god. God is one ok people of moses from adam to us god is one.Then u get people who say we dont belive in any religon becse its made up they just try brainwashing u with these pathetic ideas have u heard this one WE came from evalution Sad to sy that these people fight tooth to tail to say and try to proof which they havent done in the slightest just conjestruing a billions years ago this happened but before this we thing this happened fromm 100000 years on their is a strong possability this happened...then stupid stuff like cloning etc comes up cause we are taught there is no god

inam responded 5 years ago: #46

By the way am a muslim which is not anthing that theses people that have no knowledge are accusing or saying it is it is one one of three abrhamic faiths chrisitnty Judism and islam.....By thee way what Abrham followwe resmebles islam more then god having a son or the jews who cliam they will only go to paradise. To learn more about it i recommend u to www.islamtomrrow.com

Gale Davy responded 5 years ago: #47

Wow. This "dialogue" is truly amazing. Every misconception, every misunderstanding, every misspelling! Thank you Molly for some actual information.
The problem with adult stem cells are twofold - very limited in number (and difficult to access) and a lack of pluripotency. The reason embryonic stem cells are so promising is that they are pluripotent; that is, they have the ability to become any type of cell.
To Timmay and Aunt Tillie - No, the point is not to produce humans. The point, and what scientists want to do, is to create cells - cloned cells - not cloned human beings. In fact, the scientific community here in the US and abroad (including the UK) have supported bans on the cloning of humans. We want to be able to do human cloning; that is, clone cells in order to use these cells to help cure, prevent or treat disease or injury. We do not want to clone humans; that is, create babies.
Cloning occurs in nature. Cloned individuals share DNA, but are not the same. A maternal twin is a clone of his/her twin. That does not mean they are the same person.
Sometimes it's difficult to understand these concepts because of the language we use. However, it is my belief that if the scientific committee continues to reach out to the public, educating people about the differences between cloning cells and cloning beings, that eventually our discomfort with some of the progress we are making will be alleviated.

michael responded 5 years ago: #48

If god made us in his image, then why can we not play god? What is playing god?

Cherio responded 5 years ago: #49

Religious people are so aggressive and trying to force other people to change as THEY want. What if I have my own beliefs? Why creating this religion based separatism? We can co-exist. Those who do not support protein cloning - stay away with what you can do. Those who want help from scientists will use their help. Or maybe those suffering people should start yelling "Hey, let's get rid of those schizophrenics that want us dead!".

bob responded 5 years ago: #50

to: mirte
if god does not allow; can god be all powerful?
I think that god wouldn't be god if god was not everything. If god does not allow; then god is limeting god. Can god limit god?

G-Max responded 5 years ago: #51

Ignorance is the scariest thing. Also religion makes people quite ignorant as well and stubborn. They are cloning human cells not making human out of it. "Do not play GOD"? When you are sick and in need of surgery to live do you go to see a doctor? Of course you do. If you do not want to play God then you should not even get a surgery and let the nature take its course because that is God's will and that is how God made this world. Ignorant religious fanatic fools... Wake up .. it's 21st Century...

responded 5 years ago: #52

Wait guys, I have the best idea. We could all spew our ideals into one thread in an emotional fit of rage validated by religion! Oh wait...

Scott responded 4 years ago: #53

Oh shit! I just read Human Cloning on the headline and I went completely bizerk and broke everything in my house! May God have mercy on your souls!!

Also, if you read the article they are cloning embro cells in order to advance stem cell research, which is kind of distant from growing these embryos into adult humans, but if it did occur maybe the American-Christian class would drop a sword and pick up a dagger and end their beliefs, and finally realize that man is god.

Of course, this is my opinion, and no one has to read it.

- Scott

T2000 responded 4 years ago: #54

I hope we evolve into a hybrid species combining the best of genetic mutation and technology. A cyborg if possible. Then the collective should wage a genocidal war on deluded believers of religion!!! Muhuhaha (evil laugh)

Eugenics responded 4 years ago: #55

Why dont we not bother finding a cure. Instead prevent the people with genetic disorders from having children and in 70 or so years time the gene pool will be a lot stronger. Harse I know but what about un-natural selecrion and eradication of the weakest.

Chris responded 4 years ago: #56

I have a spinal cord injury and the issue to me is not the aspect of cloning,, since the fetus is aborted. The issue to me is that a potential life, as arguable as that might be, will be created to be destroyed. I would rather continue with my disability than be partake in the destruction of life. If one believes a 200 cell being is not yet a life, than what about amoebas and simple-celled organisms? They are considered life. It amuses me the justifications people will come up with in order to seek health for themselves. I'll sit back and watch the chips fall. Cloning is going on under cover and likely for the purpose of creating adult humans. We will see this soon -in my humble opinion. God bless all of us with disease.

Balance responded 4 years ago: #57

It appears that the single-most common debate is between the religious viewpoint and the rational. Whether "christian," "islamic" or "other" religions, the viewpoint expressed is an interpretation of humans "playing" or "insulting" or "demeaning" god and religion in some way by exploring science at this fundamental level. I think a lot of "christians" would be surprised to find that they have so much in common with "muslims" and others in this way.
Can one believe in God but not believe in the singular idea that whenever man pushes the boundaries of conventionally, religious prescribed ideas that s/he is challenging God in some way? I honestly doubt that Mr. Wilmut and all the others who are involved in stem cell research do so with this thought in mind. I believe many, if not most, of these scientists are in fact people who believe in God. But they may not subscribe to the notion that knowledge pursued to the benefit humankind is necessarily a challenge to God.
One thinks of all those who have come before - Galileo, Da Vinci, and every single scientist known and unknown who has plumbed the depths of life in search of understanding and the ability to heal. According to the religious dictum posited here by so many (and regardless of the particular brand of their faith), each one of these individual seekers has challenged God, will pay the price, and has invited immediate punishment on the whole of humankind. Under this mindset, has our species ever existed for one moment without someone, somewhere inviting the wrath of God?
To Chris: I wish you well. Bear in mind that no one claims that a 20-30 celled blastocyst (common in this area of research) nor even a 200 celled blastocyst is not life. Life is what this all about. But a 200 celled blastocyst (or embryo, but not fetus - that is an entirely different thing) is not a person. And, finally, approximately 400,000 of these embryos currently exist, frozen in in vitro fertilization clinics throughout the US. For couples hoping for children, the in vitro fertilization process is (oftentimes in their words - "a godsend") a great hope. Right now, once they have completed the in vitro process, they are faced with these options - donate these embryos to other couples (not generally feasible); maintain these embryos frozen indefinitely (very expensive); or simply discard them (the overwhelming choice among these couples). Under the Bush administration do not have the option of donating them for stem cell research.
What a strange world we live we in.

jerry responded 4 years ago: #58

The religious interpretation of cloning in that stem cells have a soul. First of all there is no such thing as a soul it is a manifistation of our ancient past to fortify ourselves against death. Souls don't exist therefore why the "fear of god" of some people against stem cells? The soul doesn't exist and neither does a man diety except in our minds. We are part of nature and all of nature is our creator; in our part of the universe we are god and evolution can change that. I am hoping for a cure for a rare genetic desease that I have, a weakness of the arteries...I pray to the stem cell scientists to find a cure for this disease and others. Good luck to cloning UK

runaway devotee responded 4 years ago: #59

Religion is important...science is also important...limits must be drawn in both areas...religion is a complex thing,its boundaries unknown to us...science...we know...we created it...let us dive into it and fix what god did not...long live science and technology...

Prakash Donda responded 4 years ago: #60

Human cloning will never take away the unique intellectual capabilties of real humans, but for science purposes acquring knowledge will not harm the society but enhance it.

h wightman responded 4 years ago: #61

i am totally in favour of any research and testing for MND as my mother has it,and it breaks my heart as i wish i could do something for her.i would even go as far as being a ginipig,to help find a cure.

Nitai responded 3 years ago: #62

Well, according to the eastern wisdom everything is happening according the law of karma - action and reaction. If some have to be born as crippled clones there is certainly reason for that. If some are born as normal clones there is also reason for that. Everything is under the control of this law of karma, which is ultimately under the control of God. Thus even the cloners are just an instruments in the chain of actions and reaction, namely they clone because of their previous karma and others are also cloned because of their previous karma. Nobody can change the law of nature of actions and reactions. Thus we might not stop cloning but we can act in such a way that we don't get a cloned body in the next life.

To read more about karma and reincarnation visit:
http://www.freewebtown.com/bhaktivedanta108
The Hare Krishna Views On Science

Nitai

ARUN GAUTHAM responded 2 years ago: #63

NO This should not happen. Each person is different from each other. This is against the law of nature.

Zulqarnain responded 2 years ago: #64

Hey guys !
cloning can cause more problems in the daily life.
because genetic combnation is same of all coloned people to their origional people. so it can also cause crimes in society.

KKK responded 1 year ago: #65

COMMENT DELETED

vaughn nebeker responded 1 year ago: #66

the last time I cloned two girl's humen's It was about $100,000.00 a clone has cost come dowen eney. this year the Girl' hit ages 14# humen cloning doing well.

CHIPSTER responded 10 months ago: #67

STOP PLAYING GOD"

-Add Your Comment

Name:
E-mail:

Comment Policy: WTN News accepts comments that are on-topic and do not contain advertisements, profanity or personal attacks. Comments represent the views of the individuals who post them and do not necessarily represent the views of WTN Media or our partners, advertisers, or sources. Comments are moderated and not immediately posted. Your email address will not be posted.

WTN Media cannot accept liability for the content of comments posted here or verify their accuracy. If you believe this comment section is being abused, contact edit@wistechnology.com.

Advertisement
Advertisement

-More Stories

WTN Media Presents