Advertisement
*
Reproduction permitted for personal use only. For reprints and reprint permission, contact reprints@wistechnology.com.

Double your productivity! Hype that damages technologists' reputations

My Mom, like moms everywhere, once told me that if you couldn't say anything nice, don't say anything at all. But where's the fun in that?

Occasionally something so egregious happens that it must be addressed. I'm talking, of course, about the latest advertisement for Sharp products.

What's got my steam vents working overtime is the line, "We doubled your productivity by scanning double-side documents in a single pass." Oh my. What kind of business do they think I'm in that double-side scanning doubles my productivity? Perhaps I'm a professional intern and didn't realize it. Or a copyista down at the Kinkos.

Not that I don't like to get worked up for no reason, but this time it's tied to a regular theme of this column. Technology, in and of itself, is never a complete solution either in terms of productivity or innovation. When rogue technology marketers suggest otherwise, they only make it harder for the rest of us to be taken seriously in business discussions.

I've said it before, I'm saying it now, and I'll say it again. Applied innovation and improvement with technology requires three things: good technology, good process, and great execution. Anybody who tries to sell you one or two of those as the whole package is trying to pull a fast one. Unfortunately it happens all the time and is a primary cause of project failure rates being stuck in the high double digits despite all our standards, methodologies, and project management.
Advertisement
It's that last one that catches most folks – great execution.

I'm not talking about great technology execution. I'm talking about great business execution. I'm talking about technologists who have become familiar with the folks in the daily trenches of business, whatever that means for their particular organization, and gotten serious about applying technology in ways that make their activities easier, better, and more effective.

I'm sure somebody in the ad agency who handles Sharp products got a little thrill when they came up with that line. It sounds so good. Unfortunately, we all participate in paying the price for their little jolt. It's just one more ding in the credibility of all technologists from over-hyping the impact of technology.

Minor or not, it's a double hit. First, without adding any value, it adds to that din that makes it so hard to get any real attention from anybody. Second, even if we should break through, the first reaction is "Oh, great. Another technologist. Haven't they learned, yet, that it's not about the technology?"

I know a lot of technology folks who are working very hard to develop a strong understanding of the businesses they serve. They deserve more than this kind of buzzword babble in return.

I know I shouldn't be picking on Sharp. They're far from alone. I'm just trying to not let myself get started on the dumb dinosaur ads that seem to imply being one rev off current in commodity software is some kind of crisis, or the annoying "help desk" and "virtual classroom" that always has room for one more wild exaggeration of impact.

Will this kind of hype ever change? Probably not. There's too much competition to capture that next customer, too much pressure to get bigger and better all the time. I don't get on this pre-programmed rant to make it go away, but rather to provide some balance, to provide another perspective.

I like to think that it's helpful when a technology insider calls for a true accounting of technology value. I'm not the only one who can play that role. I'd be happy if you decided you wanted to play too.

Byron Glick is a principal at Prairie Star Consulting, LLC of Madison Wis. Prairie Star specializes in managing the organizational impacts of technology. He can be contacted via e-mail at byron.glick@prairiestarconsulting.com or via telephone at 608/345-3958.

The opinions expressed herein or statements made in the above column are solely those of the author, & do not necessarily reflect the views of Wisconsin Technology Network, LLC. (WTN). WTN, LLC accepts no legal liability or responsibility for any claims made or opinions expressed herein.

Comments

Mike Starr responded 4 years ago: #1

Byron misses the point entirely. The ad isn't targeted at the users of scanning functionality, it's targeted at the purchasers of scanning technology.

I know a woman who spends her entire day scanning documents. It's part of her job working for a large insurance company. She and several others at the company are using entirely inappropriate consumer-level scanners to bring hand-written documents into the corporate system for archival and retrieval purposes. She would be much more productive if she had a system that fed in a stack of documents and scanned both sides automatically.

Doubling her productivity would be a big thing to her employer. It would be like having two (or more) employees doing the same task. Or, if a company had a large number of employees doing this chore, they could do it with half the staff. These are the things that bonuses and promotions are made of.

You may look at the ad from Sharp as a ding in the credibility of all technologists from over-hyping the impact of technology but I look at your narrow understanding of the technology and its uses as a ding in the credibility of all technology writers.

Mike Starr
WriteStarr Information Services
mike@writestarr.com
http://www.writestarr.com

Brian Tinkler responded 4 years ago: #2

Byron makes some good points about the perils of overhyping technology, but as Mike points out in his comments, I think Byron is missing some of the issues. We've all suffered (in the IT industry) from over-promising and over-hyping various new technologies. However, even while over-hyped, these technologies have consistently succeeded at improving the productivity of ourselves, our companies, and our customers. To say this hype is damaging is true to a point, but most customers are educated enough these days to realize where hype goes too far and to evaluate new technologies' impact on their organizations from a rational and informed perspective.

One point I will also make is that while Byron believes certain technologies are "commoditized", others who utilize their new functionality within each release do not see them as such. Specifically, the improvements being made in the product he alludes to as being evangelized by the "dumb dinosaur ads" only proves that Byron doesn't understand that this software is offering incredible new value. I'm sure that is because he only makes use of the "commoditized" portion of that software. This is all fine, but illustrates that what one person, one company, or one industry believes about over-hyping technology does not necessarily apply to others. The reason is best summarized by Byron's own 3-part requirements for applied innovation and improvement with technology - good technology, good process, and great execution. Since process and execution are the unique variables (we all share the same access to technology in business), it's how each person and company uses the technology in their processes and business execution that creates the value. Being "one rev back" can be a competitive limitation, especially in software that is used by 90% of your company's people.

-Add Your Comment

Name:
E-mail:

Comment Policy: WTN News accepts comments that are on-topic and do not contain advertisements, profanity or personal attacks. Comments represent the views of the individuals who post them and do not necessarily represent the views of WTN Media or our partners, advertisers, or sources. Comments are moderated and not immediately posted. Your email address will not be posted.

WTN Media cannot accept liability for the content of comments posted here or verify their accuracy. If you believe this comment section is being abused, contact edit@wistechnology.com.

Advertisement
Advertisement
WTN Media Presents