Advertisement
*
Reproduction permitted for personal use only. For reprints and reprint permission, contact reprints@wistechnology.com.

Death of Customer Service

Great customer service died a slow death during the past twenty years. It died due to neglect, greed, selfishness, and rude behavior by companies, service agents, and ---customers!

Most of the killing blows were administered thoughtlessly.

Is our current spate of self-obsession leading us to ignore common sense and courtesy? Will “Thank you!” eventually become as dated as “Fortnight” in American conversations? Are we really becoming “ugly Americans?” Has it really become more important to us to manage our careers rather than managing our responsibilities?

A college friend (we graduated together in 1980) and I met for lunch and became engrossed in the subject of customer service. She teaches at a large east coast university and had just completed a consulting project for an e-commerce company. I was consulting with a long distance telephone company, helping them correct some sub-standard customer service measurements. My friend and I had a lot to talk about.

My friend postulated that customer service started to decline with the rise of “me-first” attitudes in the 1980s. As proof, she offered, “people, today, are comfortable with saying ‘No problem’ rather than ‘You’re welcome’ after a nice comment or a service is performed for them. ‘No problem’ has a personal root. It really means ‘No problem for me !’ It means ‘ I did it because it did not cause me a problem.’ That is much different from ‘You’re welcome.’ ‘You’re welcome’ is directed away from the personal. It means you are welcome to my service (or kind words) to you . ‘No problem’ means ‘ I served you because it did not interfere with me. ’ In my opinion, the difference between those common statement clearly shows what has happened to customer service.” She continued, “a while ago, customer service people prided themselves on leaving their customers with a satisfied feeling about their company, products, or services. Today, customer service people seem to only want to leave their customers so they (the service person) are not associated with the exchange. In other words, the exchange could not cause a problem for them. ”
Advertisement
I respectfully disagreed with her fundamental premise, but agreed that customer service has changed – and for the worse! I responded, “I don’t think that the change has as much to do with egoism as it does with an apparent breakdown in respect. To me, it seems that service people don’t show the respect they should - respect for and to their customers. For example, it has become popular to address customers by their first names. That ignores all market research on the matter. Market research tells us that people like to be addressed as “Mister”, Missus” or Miz”- not as “Joe” or Nancy.”

And, I added, customer service people think little of completing their responsibilities, or imposing directions on their customers. How often have they taken or accepted ineffective measures, just to ‘get rid’ of a customer problem? Statements like “You have to” and “Get this” are common, and very irritating to customers who may have already done what the customer service person is demanding. The very worst new habit is “Shut up!” That gem was used by one of my observed agents after the customer stated an astonishing fact to the agent. The agent did not really intend the remark as an insult, but as an astonished reaction as, perhaps, “ Really !?” But the customer reacted angrily, and discontinued the call. It was a staring example of a new-age exclamation creating a real problem for an older customer.

Connecting People Technology and Ideas Thu Sep 11 21:31:09 CDT 2003

Wisconsin Technology Network


Death of Customer Service

By Dennis Parker, Guest Columnist

Great customer service died a slow death during the past twenty years. It died due to neglect, greed, selfishness, and rude behavior by companies, service agents, and ---customers!

Most of the killing blows were administered thoughtlessly.

Is our current spate of self-obsession leading us to ignore common sense and courtesy? Will “Thank you!” eventually become as dated as “Fortnight” in American conversations? Are we really becoming “ugly Americans?” Has it really become more important to us to manage our careers rather than managing our responsibilities?

A college friend (we graduated together in 1980) and I met for lunch and became engrossed in the subject of customer service. She teaches at a large east coast university and had just completed a consulting project for an e-commerce company. I was consulting with a long distance telephone company, helping them correct some sub-standard customer service measurements. My friend and I had a lot to talk about.

My friend postulated that customer service started to decline with the rise of “me-first” attitudes in the 1980s. As proof, she offered, “people, today, are comfortable with saying ‘No problem’ rather than ‘You’re welcome’ after a nice comment or a service is performed for them. ‘No problem’ has a personal root. It really means ‘No problem for me !’ It means ‘ I did it because it did not cause me a problem.’ That is much different from ‘You’re welcome.’ ‘You’re welcome’ is directed away from the personal. It means you are welcome to my service (or kind words) to you . ‘No problem’ means ‘ I served you because it did not interfere with me. ’ In my opinion, the difference between those common statement clearly shows what has happened to customer service.” She continued, “a while ago, customer service people prided themselves on leaving their customers with a satisfied feeling about their company, products, or services. Today, customer service people seem to only want to leave their customers so they (the service person) are not associated with the exchange. In other words, the exchange could not cause a problem for them. ”

I respectfully disagreed with her fundamental premise, but agreed that customer service has changed – and for the worse! I responded, “I don’t think that the change has as much to do with egoism as it does with an apparent breakdown in respect. To me, it seems that service people don’t show the respect they should - respect for and to their customers. For example, it has become popular to address customers by their first names. That ignores all market research on the matter. Market research tells us that people like to be addressed as “Mister”, Missus” or Miz”- not as “Joe” or Nancy.”

And, I added, customer service people think little of completing their responsibilities, or imposing directions on their customers. How often have they taken or accepted ineffective measures, just to ‘get rid’ of a customer problem? Statements like “You have to” and “Get this” are common, and very irritating to customers who may have already done what the customer service person is demanding. The very worst new habit is “Shut up!” That gem was used by one of my observed agents after the customer stated an astonishing fact to the agent. The agent did not really intend the remark as an insult, but as an astonished reaction as, perhaps, “ Really !?” But the customer reacted angrily, and discontinued the call. It was a staring example of a new-age exclamation creating a real problem for an older customer.

My friend and I remain friends, agreeing and disagreeing (as friends often do) about customer service today. We continue our debates by phone calls, and exchange e-mail articles on the subject. We agree that much work remains before customer service returns to its formerly healthy status.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dennis Parker is President of Telemedia Resource Group and a contributing columnist for the Wisconsin Technology Network. He welcomes your comments at dparker83@telemediarg.com

Comments

Philip D responded 2 years ago: #1

I think the decline in customer service is far more calculated than a simple breakdown of interpersonal skills. I think the quest for almighty dollar has become so entrenched as the prime objective that business leaders have lost the ability to see the value of non-monentary assets like a satisfied customer. Typically, if good customer service costs a company 4.5 percent of GP, and poor customer service plus associated expenses (lost rev, employee turn over) cost that same company 4 percent of GP, the company will opt for the latter more often than not.

As examples of this process in action, I would submit the following:

- Most customer service departments today have eliminated the "0" option from almost all IVR menus. And while IVR call routing can help reduce agent costs, blocking the customer from bypassing that menu to access an agent is a clear decision to place CS costs above customer needs.

- Most companies do not permit escalation above the agents floor supervior, and many now are starting to prohibit even that. Thus, a customer who is unserved by an agent (or receives rude treatment, etc.) is left with no avenue to seek a solution to their problem. Again, because of the personnel cost, policy has dictated that no customer shall access a member of management.

I have many more, perhaps I will add them later...

-Add Your Comment

Name:
E-mail:

Comment Policy: WTN News accepts comments that are on-topic and do not contain advertisements, profanity or personal attacks. Comments represent the views of the individuals who post them and do not necessarily represent the views of WTN Media or our partners, advertisers, or sources. Comments are moderated and not immediately posted. Your email address will not be posted.

WTN Media cannot accept liability for the content of comments posted here or verify their accuracy. If you believe this comment section is being abused, contact edit@wistechnology.com.

Advertisement
Advertisement

-More Stories

WTN Media Presents