Advertisement
*
Reproduction permitted for personal use only. For reprints and reprint permission, contact reprints@wistechnology.com.

Madison - Wired and unplugged

Madison is a wired and unplugged city. Broadband access is easily available. Many businesses offer Internet access as a convenience and creative way to attract customers. However, recent news reports and editorials might lead you to believe that the city is falling behind other municipalities in terms of wireless access. Some suggest the situation will impact everything from tourism to job creation.

Mayor Dave Cieslewicz's plan to expand wireless Internet access in the downtown area, airport and other municipalities hit a roadblock when the AOL-SkyCable team announced it no longer desired to invest in providing these services. It pulled the plug on a wireless services contract awarded in a competitive bid process. Following the AOL move, Madison-based SkyCable TV ceased operations last Friday.

TDS Telecom has announced that it is awaiting FCC approval for the wireless spectrum assets held by SkyCable TV. TDS would like to deploy wireless broadband to cover a 35-mile radius around Madison.

Madison's municipal options are ranging from reviewing previous bids, the city going at it alone, to initiating a new process to select a replacement vendor. All of those solutions have merit as well as significant challenges and will further delay the mayor's dream.

But is Madison really suffering from lack of wireless access?
Advertisement
I investigated the city's wireless status by strolling from the Capitol to the UW along State Street. I immediately discovered an open wireless access point from which I searched the Web and found 65 wireless hotspots for the city of Madison, of which 29 were free. I discovered several more unlisted hotspots during my adventure.

The businesses that offered access were crowded with customers that appeared to be students, tourists and everyday people seeking Internet access, at a place where they could buy food and drink. Surprisingly, I discovered numerous open, unsecured wireless connections that broadcast from buildings along my route. (Users should exercise extreme caution when accessing any public network and use firewalls and other security software.)

At the far end of State Street, the campus libraries and student union and outdoor terrace were full of people unplugged accessing the Internet. UW-Madison has announced plans to have wireless access for the entire campus by June 2006, by adding 2,200 access points for wireless access in 180 dorms, laboratories and administration buildings.

Madison visitors appear to have plenty of wireless access provided by hotels and conference centers.

Cities and towns across the country are considering developing and deploying wireless access for a variety of reasons. Some are facilitating private sector networks, and some are offering taxpayer-supported networks.

Intel, Google and others are looking to work with pilot communities to deploy comprehensive wireless services ranging from free access to improving government efficiency. Madison is hopefully exploring those offerings.

Economic development and job creation are the most frequently cited reasons for cities to offer wireless. And, cities want to be known as "cutting edge." However, the Washington D.C.- based Millennium Research Council in a February 2005 whitepaper entitled "Not in the Public interest - The Myth of Municipal Wi-FI Networks claimed that there is little proof that municipal wireless networks improve economic development and tourism.

While the city and county sort this out these expanded services, Dane County Airport should sign a short-term agreement with one of the numerous vendors that serve similar facilities. Airport officials said they are moving forward to provide the airport with its own wireless network.

Other alternatives for Madison's mobile professionals include offerings from Verizon and Sprint that provide wireless broadband access via a PC card, with high-speed cellular technology, for as little as $60 per month. T-Mobile, Boingo, Wayport and others offer services that are already installed at most major airports, hotels and cafes, but require you to find specific wireless hotspots. And many cell phones now offer internet connectivity that can extended to your computer.

The AOL-SkyCable pullout of the Madison project might be viewed as an opportunity to re-evaluate whether such a broad, public-supported venture is necessary. In the meantime, the private sector seems to be doing just fine providing Madison with options for wireless access.


Mike Klein is WTN’s editorial director and can be reached at mike@wistechnology.com.

Comments

Mark Porter responded 3 years ago: #1

While Madison may be well covered with wireless access (my own experience mirrors Mike's, the remainder of Dane County is not so fortunate. In fact, if you move a mere mile outside Madison, you will quickly encounter a patchwork quilt of broadband accessibility...or more accurate, inaccessibility. I have been attempting to encourage the various Telcos, ISPs and others in the area to extend broadband access to no avail. So, while Mike's comments are valid for the metro area, there is clearly a need for additional action to serve the rest of the less-populated areas within Dane county. While the private sector has cherry-picked the easiest, densest areas, the rest remain islands of inaccessability...
mark porter.

Christopher Kuhl responded 3 years ago: #2

WEBbeams, is a Milwaukee-based, Wi-Fi integrator and service provider, with 'hot spots' not only in the Milwaukee metro area, but throughout eastern Wisconsin and northern Illinois and at independent cafes across the country. They are also contracted to provide services at our two 'incubator/shared office' facilities in downtown Milwaukee. In-state, they also have locations at the Midwest Airlines Center, numerous hotels and resorts, the Central Wisconsin Airport and are a Boingo! partner for national roaming. The Madison Airport would be well advised to give a Wisconsin-based tech company the opportunity to extend their proven sevices to this important facility as well.

Christopher Kuhl
Founder/IT Fusion Business Centers, Inc.

David Henderson responded 3 years ago: #3

erm...I think AOL/Sky Cable are about as private sector as you can get. Kudos to the city of Madison for working out a way to get the private sector to fund a fantastic network that would have brought ubiquitous wireless broadband coverage to the whole city as well as offering it wholesale to any other provider.
You're missing the point if you think that it was a public sector offering - read the AOL proposal.

Dave Benforado responded 3 years ago: #4

Kudos to the City of Madison for continuing to push the envelope on this front, even when the private sector (America Online) pulled the plug and left Madison Onhold (for the time being). Municipalities are part of the solution here folks, and yes, public/private partnerships are a good way to implement otherwise unreachable solutions. For a good balanced discussion of the positive roll that local governments can play in this arena, please read Federal Trade Commission Commissioner Jon Leibowitz's 9/22/05 remarks to the 25th Conference of the National Association of Telecommunications Officers and Advisors (NATOA) titled "Municipal Broadband: Should Cities Have a Voice?" (here's a hotlink): http://www.ftc.gov/speeches/leibowitz/050922municipalbroadband.pdf

albert chiozzi responded 2 years ago: #5

While I agree that Madison has a larger number of hotspots than most similarly-sized cities, I'm not sure that is releveant to the ultimate goal of this technology. There was a time when we might make the statement that we do not need cellular phone technology because we have an adequate number of strategically located pay phones in town.

Many years ago, I built cable television systems in the northeast and we faced parallax roadblocks for the first few years ("I already get five channels off-air"). Technologies such as WiBro and WiFi will probably happen, (the carrier offerings such as EvDo simply aren't fast or ubiquitous enough), it's just a question of when. An "untethered" society will probably not come as a result of government-sponsored (albeit not funded) initiatives, but instead be borne of foreseeable corporate profit. There was a time when we in cable TV forecasted per-customer revenues of $2.95 per month, and we were fine with that. My cable bill (with internet) is now over $100 per month, and believe me that difference is not simply inflationary.

Lastly, I have been involved in the rollout of many of the carrier MMDS spectrum offerings (such as the now defunct Sprint ION) across the U.S. The problem there was that they were so excited about the technology that they forgot to properly define the long-term business case. As with ION the spectrum owned by SkyCable is MMDS. I would hope that TDS has an idea of what might represent a future killer application.

-Add Your Comment

Name:
E-mail:

Comment Policy: WTN News accepts comments that are on-topic and do not contain advertisements, profanity or personal attacks. Comments represent the views of the individuals who post them and do not necessarily represent the views of WTN Media or our partners, advertisers, or sources.

WTN Media cannot accept liability for the content of comments posted here or verify their accuracy. If you believe this comment section is being abused, contact edit@wistechnology.com.

Advertisement
Advertisement
WTN Media Presents