Advertisement
*
Reproduction permitted for personal use only. For reprints and reprint permission, contact reprints@wistechnology.com.

Local software company takes Google to court over a patent

Madison, Wis. - For the second time in six years, a Madison software company has sued a technology giant, claiming patent infringement.

This time Hyperphrase Technologies has filed suit against Google, Inc., the Internet search engine company, for allegedly using technology that provides viewers of a Web page with links to other sites or advertisements. Hyperphrase claims that Google Toolbar features AutoLink and AdSense have infringed on its patents on data storage and retrieval. Hyperphrase does not appear to have a web site.

William Flachsbart, an attorney with the Chicago intellectual property firm Niro, Scavone, Haller & Niro, said Google was made aware of Hyperphrase's concern through correspondence, and it is well aware of the patents. Flachsbart is one of the attorneys representing Hyperphrase.

The lawsuit, which cites infringement of four patents, was filed in U.S. District Court in Madison before Judge John Shabaz. It asks for unspecified damages and for Google to stop using the technologies.

Most of these types of suits are settled before a judge makes a final ruling, according to Flachsbart. "That certainly happens," he said. "I wouldn't say 90 percent of the time, but I would say it happens the majority of the time."
Advertisement
Thus far, Google has declined to comment on the suit.

Hyperphrase unsuccessfully sued Microsoft Corp. for allegedly using its intellectual property. The Wisconsin firm, which had sought $2 billion in damages from the software giant, lost the suit in 2003 when District Judge Barbara Crabb ruled that its innovation worked differently than the smart tag technology in Microsoft Office XP. In that case, Hyperphrase had alleged the infringement of three patents. It holds 30 patents in all.

Comments

Squirt responded 3 years ago: #1

So...these people don't even have a website but they have 30 patents related to I.T.? And they are a sue happy little upstart with no friends? What's with $2 billion? Couldn't they settle on a nice round half tril? Why not a gazillion? Geez, I wish I had a patent on stupidity...I'd be rich from these punks...

Alan Rice responded 3 years ago: #2

If Google is actually infringing their patent then I hope they are very successful. I don't use the Google Toolbar anyway, I have the Advanced Searchbar, http://www.advancedsearchbar.com and it works much better and has more features then the Google Toolbar.

mojo responded 3 years ago: #3

"I wish I had a patent on stupidity" - and who has that much time to spend issuing cease and desist orders to these people?

2me responded 3 years ago: #4

I think the US Patent Office needs to be turned on its head, revamped. Tha US Patent Office seems to give frivolous patents for intellectual property all the time. Creating the sue happy environment. Intellectual property should be very specific - there seems to be an overabundance of generalizations in approved patents that point to not one technology but very open to interpretation. This is just wrong.

Plavix responded 3 years ago: #5

If you aren't an inventor, and haven't created something and then watched someone make gazillions off it without paying you a dime, then you don't have any basis for criticising.

ross dworkin responded 1 year ago: #6

If someone has an idea that is unique, unobvious to someone skilled in the art, and has utility, then the fact they implement their idea with a machine that is easily reprogrammable, as opposed to non-reprogrammable hardware or a mechanical manifestation, they should not be denied a pattent.
Software patents are needed for the same reasons other patents are needed, to protect creative innovators that take chances and contribute value to society. The essence of all innovation is the creative process, intellect and perseverance, not ease of theft or expense to implement.

Who could possibly want all innovations to be left to companies like Microsoft.

Solftware patents are needes for the same reasons other patents are needed, to protect creative innovators that takes chances and contribute to a process.The essence of all innovation is the creative process, intellect and persaverance, not ease of theft or expense.

-Add Your Comment

Name:
E-mail:

Comment Policy: WTN News accepts comments that are on-topic and do not contain advertisements, profanity or personal attacks. Comments represent the views of the individuals who post them and do not necessarily represent the views of WTN Media or our partners, advertisers, or sources. Comments are moderated and not immediately posted. Your email address will not be posted.

WTN Media cannot accept liability for the content of comments posted here or verify their accuracy. If you believe this comment section is being abused, contact edit@wistechnology.com.

Advertisement
Advertisement
WTN Media Presents