Advertisement
*
Reproduction permitted for personal use only. For reprints and reprint permission, contact reprints@wistechnology.com.

GOP lawmaker faults Doyle for IT problems

Madison, Wis. - Before Gov. Jim Doyle began turning up the heat on Republicans on the subject of stem cell research, a key Republican legislator had already turned the tables on him regarding problematic state information technology projects.

The projects, which now are the subject of a state audit, recently were placed at the feet of the Doyle Administration by State Sen. Ted Kanavas, R-Brookfield, who has worked with the Governor on several IT initiatives.

Kanavas does not think the troubled government projects will derail legislative attempts to promote technology as an economic development tool in the private sector, but he said the Doyle Administration has got to start executing the projects correctly.

"The best plans can be blown up by a lack of execution," Kanavas said, "and the execution of these projects has been very problematic."

State government's information technology projects have been beset with implementation delays, cost overruns, and system failures. The projects were touted as a way to improve services and save money, but the difficulties have cast doubt on the prospect of savings. No one has put an exact price tag on the loss to taxpayers, but the estimate is in the millions.

Doyle said he is concerned about the problems, but noted that some of the projects were completed before he became governor. He also said the successful projects don't get any attention in the press, and that even with the problematic ones, state technology employees believe they can work through many of the difficulties they encounter.

The Governor also suggested that state government IT projects are not much different from those in the private sector, which has experienced more than its share of IT failures. "We're the biggest business in the state, the state government," he noted. "We've got the biggest number of employees, the biggest IT systems in the state, and when I talk to businesses big and small, they are always complaining about IT systems that they thought were going to get going."

IT spend

The state spends about $740 million a year on information technology, and spending on contractors has doubled over the past decade to $90 million.

In February, the Department of Administration announced the state was scrapping an Oracle-based e-mail installation and attempting to recover $2.1 million in licenses and consulting fees. This consolidated e-mail system alone would have served 44,000 state employees with 19 servers instead of the current 220 servers, but it did not meet the state's needs even after efforts to fix it.

At the time, State CIO Matt Miszewski said the state would proceed with Microsoft products, which much of state government already uses. The Oracle product was chosen over Microsoft because its $2.6 million bid was much lower than Microsoft's $12 million bid, but Miszewski and DOA Secretary Stephen Bablitch indicated they could still save the state $1 million by continuing the consolidation project with Microsoft software.

The DOA's migration from Oracle to its previous Microsoft platform should occur next weekend (June 17 and 18), Miszewski said.

Meanwhile, the state audit will include case studies of selected major projects to identify the nature of problems that have occurred and the reasons for them, a review of the effectiveness of oversight structures established in state law, and current contracting procedures that pertain to IT projects.

Kate Wade, a program evaluation director for the Legislative Audit Bureau, said auditors are in the early phase of field work on what she called an "inventory audit" with an analytical component. She said all audit work and findings remain confidential until all the work is complete.

"We aim to release the report in early calendar year 2007 so that it's useful to the legislature as they go into their session," Wade said. That session will include deliberations on the 2007-09 state budget.

Wade said those findings will be posted on the Audit Bureau's Website, and she said it's customary for the Joint Legislative Audit Committee to hold a public hearing on the findings of individual audits.

Related stories

State alters schedule for server consolidation

State IT failures are not inevitable

Miszewski touts benefits of IT integration

Oracle out, Microsoft in for state e-mail project

Wisconsin introduces new state IT plan

State CIO wants to unify electronic government

Comments

1+1=3 responded 2 years ago: #1

"The Oracle product was chosen over Microsoft because its $2.6 million bid was much lower than Microsoft's $12 million bid, but Miszewski and DOA Secretary Stephen Bablitch indicated they could still save the state $1 million by continuing the consolidation project with Microsoft software." So, the savings were originally estimated at $1.7 million per year. The difference between $12 million (Microsoft bid) and $2.6 million (Oracle bid) is $9.4 million. So it should take an extra 9.4/1.7=5.5 years to start making the savings???? Has everyone in state government forgot how to do math? Doesn't compute!

concerned citizen responded 2 years ago: #2

It is often said that the worst friend to have is a politician. A couple years ago, the Senator was one of the CIO's biggest fans, as evidenced by the many articles touting their combined visionary abilities.

Here's a couple of representative articles in government technology magazines:

http://www.governmententerprise.com/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=17501143

http://www.govtech.net/magazine/story.php?id=83610&reprint=0

One of my favorite quotes:

"We've made a lot of progress," Kanavas said, "and we're going to make more because Matt and I know what we're doing."

State worker responded 2 years ago: #3

Well, it is Doyle's fault for believing the bill of goods he was sold. Government doesn't work like private industry - private industry doesn't have politicians trying to control what they don't understand AND wouldn't care about if there wasn't something in it for tmem.
The DOA ChiefIdiotOnboard is single-tracked to implement a bad idea regardless of the millions he has to spend - to save spare change. DOA was told consolidation was a bad idea - yet they continue anyway.
All power to DOA. This isn't about saving money - It's about control. And they'll just keep making bad, expensive decisions until somebody on the hill stops them.

Concerned 2 responded 2 years ago: #4

Thank you, Concerned Citizen. I cringed the first time I read the quote you reference "...Matt and I know what we're doing." I cringed again when I read it a today. It should be obvious to Matt that although he had a vision, it was flawed because he grossly underestimated the complexity of the projects, as well as the experience, knowledge and talent needed to execute them. Matt also doesn't like anyone to point this out to him. He talks a good game, but those of us with experience on large projects knew he didn't know what he was talking about or how to do it successfully. His prior experience is not applicable to what he talked about doing - even if he thinks it is.

Throw Kanavas Out responded 2 years ago: #5

Ditto. Kanavas would be the first to step up for his share of the credit.

1+1=3 responded 2 years ago: #6

Kanavas, the Governor, the state CIO, all have a responsibility to examine the documentation supporting a project, and make decisions regarding it. They should all participate in and take responsibility for both the successes and failures. In this case the math did not support it, major consulting publications like Gartner recommended caution, up front analysis was flawed, etc., etc., etc. No agency work group supported the project as executed.

Implied in this article by what the Governor said, is that practices and procedures followed by both successful and failed projects made no differences to their chances of success or failure. So, simply demonstrating that there are successful projects would excuse a failure, now and then, as just be an anomaly of the averages. I think that the State audit on IT projects will in fact prove him wrong: that practices and procedures followed and not followed by IT projects do indeed make a difference between having success or failure. And when that happens, hopefully, the right people will get what is deserved and not deserved.

I am a big supporter of math. Math is the single most important ingredient to thoughtful analysis. Math rocks.

none responded 2 years ago: #7

Matt is a bull in a china shop with the bill for broken goods going to the taxpayers. He wanted to make a name for himself and he has. When you put someone with no IT experience at the head of such a complex IT environment, what do you expect? The e-mail project seems to be referenced over and over in various article comments. If it is the example of where things go wrong, then be aware that Matt is 100 percent wrong when he claims there was no choice when comparing price between OCS and Exchange.

He claims the "additional client licenses" needed for Exchange would have been a hidden cost, but in May of 2004 DOA purchased all of the Exchange client licenses as did every other major agency in the state outside of Corrections and Transportation. If Matt was so concerned with saving money by going to OCS, why did he allow the majority of the state to pay for the Exchange licenses now being used back in May of 2004?

Matt also fails to tell the press that the 12 million dollar bid for Exchange included optional line items in excess of three million dollars, and the OCS bid had open-ended service estimates and additional costs beyond the $2.6 million constantly quoted. Any responsible buyer could have evaluated the two bids and made a reasonable assertion that the costs were actually going to be very similar if both worked as advertised and known that Exchange had the lowest risk. If other projects are failing in much the same way as the OCS project failed and for the same reasons, then it would be clear that the number one problem is a CIO that sees only what he wants to see, a CIO that doesn't have enough experience to look at bids and determine where cost has already been expended and where cost is hidden, a CIO who would rather take the "(bleep) you" attitude to anyone that questions his plans (as he was quoted as saying in an interview about the server consolidation project). Matt loves high-risk projects for the sole purpose that if one succeeds, he can show everyone how he was right and they were wrong.

How long is the state going to let Matt enter into the World Series of IT Poker and lose before they take his hands off of our money?

-Add Your Comment

Name:
E-mail:

Comment Policy: WTN News accepts comments that are on-topic and do not contain advertisements, profanity or personal attacks. Comments represent the views of the individuals who post them and do not necessarily represent the views of WTN Media or our partners, advertisers, or sources.

WTN Media cannot accept liability for the content of comments posted here or verify their accuracy. If you believe this comment section is being abused, contact edit@wistechnology.com.

Advertisement
Advertisement
WTN Media Presents