Advertisement
*
Reproduction permitted for personal use only. For reprints and reprint permission, contact reprints@wistechnology.com.

Kalla: Have patience with electronic health records

Madison, Wis. - Ravi Kalla is more than the CEO of a custom software developer. As an executive with offices in Madison and India, he is pretty well plugged in to the happenings of international software, and as a member of Gov. Jim Doyle's eHealth Care Quality and Patient Safety Board, he's looking at the implementation of electronic health records.

For those hoping that a full EHR implementation is just a couple of years away, he has some deflating news: we may still be at least 10 to 15 years away from a full, and fully functional, implementation across multiple settings, including where it's needed most - emergency rooms.

Kalla
Freeing physicians from handwritten tyranny, he noted, has proven to be a daunting task, especially if paper is replaced by something even more dysfunctional. It's not a simple process to integrate patient medical information, securely and seamlessly, across multiple sites of care, but that is what will have to happen before healthcare professionals and consumers see the full value of EHRs.

In fact, Kalla believes we may see personalized medical treatments, what he called "DNA medicine," before the obstacles to EHRs are overcome. Thanks in part to the cracking the human genome, researchers have found that certain drugs are more effective in people with certain biological attributes.

Slow adoption
Advertisement
Kalla, the chief executive of Symphony Corp., noted that only nine percent of the 1- to-4 physician practices and only 15 percent of outpatient facilities have adopted EHR in the five years since the American Institute of Medicine released its landmark study on medical errors. Change is coming, he said, but it will be very gradual because there are few incentives in place for physicians.

"No one can answer the question, "How will physicians benefit from a system change?" he stated. "And that's because most of the cost savings from patient-centric care will come from the provider side."

Before that happens, the culture of medicine has to be changed because physicians view EHRs as a threat to their autonomy. "You need systematic, cultural pathways to make providers do the right things," he noted. "Providers have no incentive to measure quality."

Impetus for change, however slow, could come from the competitive pressure of keeping up with the Jones, and it could be the result of incentives provided by the government sector. Kalla cited pay-for-performance Medicare pilot programs that incent improvements in general care and chronic disease management.

But until there are more incentives for stakeholders, the change will be incremental, in part because doctors aren't the only speed bump. There are interoperability issues between systems, the need to develop a common vocabulary of medical terms, and perhaps other cultural barriers that have yet to emerge.

eHealth

Wisconsin is attempting to be on the vanguard of that change, and perhaps pick up the pace. Earlier this year, Doyle appointed Kalla to the e-Health Care Quality and Patient Safety Board, which has been charged with developing a strategic plan for statewide adoption and exchange of EHRs in five years.

The effort is in the beginning stages, and initial victories would be to implement some kind of electronic system for human resources, order entry, prescriptions, and the exchange of radiological images.

The next debate will be centered on how to share data nationwide. One school of thought is to build a centralized system for data aggregation, but Kalla views that as a "hacker's paradise" because there would be a large number of entities with access to the data. He supports, and is working to develop, a federated model that accommodates only peer-to-peer access and, in his view, is more likely to address Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act guidelines.

"The technology is there, all the encryptions," he said, "but technology doesn't tell you how to meet security and privacy requirements."

A recent partnership established between Symphony and the Michigan-based CareEvolution seeks to implement a novel clinical information-sharing model in the region within a year. Kalla believes this federated model, which uses a peer-to-peer record locator service and a double-blind data protection mechanism, will avoid the high costs and hacker security pitfalls of both the centralized and decentralized models of information depositories.

Vendor neutral interoperability solutions will be important, he said, because two parties can have the same solution and achieve a seamless transition, but a third party could gum up the works with incompatible software, rendering interoperability impossible.

Given these barriers, Kalla predicted the full adoption of EHRs will come after the first example of genetic-based medical care hits the market. Kalla believes existing management systems could quickly be made obsolete by this trend, which uses personal genetic profiles to identify a patient's predisposition toward various diseases, and to develop disease-management programs.

Cracking the human genome has made personalized medicine possible, and Kalla says this approach has much more momentum than adoption of EHRs. Healthcare providers would be wise to incorporate this possibility in their long-range planning, he advised. "I don't think people are aware of how quickly that change is coming," he said.

Hear a Symphony

The privately run Symphony Corp. was founded in 1997, and now has more than 200 employees globally, including 100 in Madison. Traditionally, it has offered healthcare providers with financial and operational performance tools in areas ranging from payroll to clinical information systems to predictive modeling, and combined that with "matured" implementation methods for it own custom products, and those produced by the likes of Epic Systems and McKesson.

Matured implementation refers to a process where new software is thoroughly tested in the work environment to ensure better predictability for clients, and it is Kalla's intention that Symphony become known for its implementation services.

The company is headquartered in Fitchburg, and has offices in the nation's capital because of its work with the Center for Medicare Services, and in Kalla's native India. It already has extensive relationships with the world's leading companies, including five of the Fortune Global 100, and a number of state government agencies in Wisconsin.

And now Symphony is gradually branching out from its core business of customized software development. It is in hospital settings writing interfaces so that systems can talk to one another, and it has acquired Strategic Health Corp., a cost containment and disease management consulting firm.

"We're completing the circle," Kalla said. "We are more of a one-stop shop."

That shop now is located in the Fitchburg Technology Campus, where Symphony moved in January to take advantage of high-bandwidth connections and video conferencing capabilities, which enable contact with employees at client sites in the United States, the Great Britain, and Spain.

It also precludes some travel in this age of record high energy prices, a trend that Kalla believes will increase the use of video conferencing. "We are trying to avoid travel as much as possible," Kalla stated. "I can't put my finger on the savings, but we think four times before making that [next] trip."

Related stories

Interview: Dr. William Yasnoff on health records, part 1

Interview: Dr. William Yasnoff on health records, part 2

Symphony Corp. moving into Fitchburg Technology Campus

Symphony Data merges with Atlanta outsourcing company


Comments

Roy Chowdhury responded 2 years ago: #1

Great article! Mr Kalla's prediction of full scale EMR adoption is accurate.

J Nathan responded 2 years ago: #2

Mr. Kalla is a healthcare visionary. Based on my experience in healthcare, his insights on where the industry currently is and where it's going make sense.

Crazy MD responded 2 years ago: #3

The problem I have with this article is - it is a lot of theory and speculation. Here is what I have trouble with.

You don't need DNA based medicine to implement EHRs. Many HMOs and Hospitals are implementing EHRs now. GE, Epic, Microsoft are all on the bandwagon. You need DNA based medicine as much as you would need stem cell medicine. Given time, they will become treatment options.

EHRs, if allowed to be monopolized by one or two companies may in fact increase health care costs. Federal EHR mandates must stipulate product lines so that inter-operability is feasible and severe competition prevails.

Exchange of EHRs should be based on high quality encryption, there is nothing wrong with wearhousing these records. The peer-to-peer nonsense presupposes that all our current wearhousing is a failure. That is certainly not the case. There is no impending danger to any wearhoused systems so that we have to create a fragile peer to peer network managed by God knows who. It is far more vulnerable than
any wearhoused system. Heck - radiological images are transfered between India and US everyday. If some hacker wants to steal the image of my prostate, let him. EHR security boogey man has been running rampant for years-it is a value losing proposition.

Health care system in the US is prone to same pareto optimality that afflicts every other business; few patients consume more resources than others. That cannot be corrected, we will continue to have million dollar babies in American hospitals. The key is to devise systems that take care of majority with primary care and prevetion needs. That can not be addressed with EHRs etc. AMA monopoly is another one.

Keep up the good work Kalla.

Damendra singh responded 1 year ago: #4

EHRS system should first be implemented in middle to upper class peoples,because they can easily afford it, and also can understand the need of it far better than the poor peoples.
first the health care people will need to educate the common peoples, about the medical errors, which can be prevented by having a cross check system, like EHRs.
and than the system can be fully implemented in mass.

Damendra singh responded 1 year ago: #5

EHRs first need to be impleted for middle and upper class of peoples, who can easily pay for it, and can be easily explained about the various benefits of EHRs.

First, the healthcare system needs to educate the common people about the occurance of medical errors, which can be easily prevented by cross-checking systems, like EHRs, once the common people are aware of the benefits of the system and need of it, the rest the system will take its own course.

Seetaram Sharma responded 12 months ago: #6

sir or madam, i m a student of mba(public health informatics) of Jamia Hamdard india.
i want to u a information about integrity of electronic health record in health sector.

-Add Your Comment

Name:
E-mail:

Comment Policy: WTN News accepts comments that are on-topic and do not contain advertisements, profanity or personal attacks. Comments represent the views of the individuals who post them and do not necessarily represent the views of WTN Media or our partners, advertisers, or sources.

WTN Media cannot accept liability for the content of comments posted here or verify their accuracy. If you believe this comment section is being abused, contact edit@wistechnology.com.

Advertisement
Advertisement

-More Stories

WTN Media Presents