Advertisement
*
Reproduction permitted for personal use only. For reprints and reprint permission, contact reprints@wistechnology.com.

Call centers and customer service: The good, the bad, and the clueless

We always hear about how everyone is implementing best practices at their organization and how they have the greatest customer service center for their product or service. Let's just cut through the rah-rah self-promotion and hype. The truth is, some are very good and some still can't put it all together.

Best practices

There are some consumer products call centers that definitely have it right. Their results are that they get repeat customers, larger sales, and build a loyalty base that generates a solid revenue stream from their call center efforts. There are others that somehow fall short of their hype and advertising. We should spotlight the good, the bad, and the clueless.

There are two that I have used over the years that have their call centers tied to their Internet applications and are good everyday examples of “getting it right.” Now these are not your big banks, your utilities, or even large companies that you would think would be in the forefront. (Most of those organizations are not even close to having a quality call center anymore.) The reality is that the two examples I have are not Fortune 100.

They have not switched their call centers to an offshore site to save some nickels while they crush their core of quality service to their customer base. They are simply focused on getting the product delivered to their customers.
Advertisement
I am impressed with the Tire Rack and Jewelry Television Network. Both sell to the general public. Both sell a mix of products from different manufacturers and they have their delivery systems, their confirmations, their guarantees, and their customer support down to perfection.

Tire Rack advertisements are in most of the major car magazines like Motor Trend, Road & Track, and others. Jewelry Television is on cable.

Once they have you in their database when you call, they have all of your information already in place and have friendly people that know the special applications of different manufacturers' tires for SUVs, cars, and trucks. It is a very simple call to replace a set of tires. The same applies to Jewelry Television.

Both follow up with an e-mail confirmation and, by magic, your tires or jewelry arrive at the designated place you want them delivered and you even save some decent money on top of it.

Sound simple? If it really was, how come other products and services are still so difficult to get right? How many times have you called companies and the person on the opposite end doesn't know the product you are asking about?

Bad example: U.S. Cellular

I have been a loyal customer of U.S. Cellular for years. I recently upgraded two cell phones and first received good service at a local retail center. I thought I made a good decision for remaining loyal to them, but then found out when I needed them, they let me down.

I was in a rush to get to the airport, and I needed to replace the phone I just bought. Somehow it got lost and I needed to deactivate it. I also needed to get a replacement phone. I called their 800 number and the agent said, “just go to the retail store and they would get me another phone” and that I would be “given a discount because I was up for new equipment.” (As I said, I have been with them for a long time - more than several years.)

Well, I went to the same store and different people were there. No other customer was in the store because it was a Sunday in January with NFL play-off games on television. It was like a different store. There was no sense of urgency to get the customer what they needed. When I told them about my conversation with THEIR customer service center, they were completely unaware of any discount or anything else.

Nothing aggravates me more than that “deer-in-the-headlights” look you get from someone who is supposed to know their product and policies. All of a sudden, everyone with the assistant manager title and all the “team leaders” can't make a decision or get an answer.

Did you know they use the same 800 number for store retail consultants that they provide to a customer? There is no higher priority 800 number for retail stores only. The retail consultant was on hold just like anyone calling in from the general public and could not get through to get to the agent I talked with and get a service question answered.

Was that a brilliant cost reduction idea some middle-management person suggested or was that a cost reduction that garnered the chief executive his bonus last year? In either case, it is a clear example of the knuckleheaded approach to running a business.

They are a commodity service and totally live down to that label and nothing more. They clearly demonstrated that they are clueless when it comes to establishing a cohesive customer-service system that ties the call centers with customers and their retail centers.

Hopefully, someone from U.S. Cellular will step up and take credit for this single-tier 800 service. Readers want to know who was the bright executive that figured retail consultants should call on the same 800 number with no priority? Did someone get some bonus for that cost reduction?

Bottom line: So much for US Cellular. As far as loyalty, I would not recommend them to anyone, and when my contract is through I will be seeking a new cellular phone company.

Maybe U.S. Cellular should hire an executive from Tire Rack or the jewelry sales company. I could hear their human resource people or an executive recruiter say, “Oh, sorry you are not from within the communications industry, so what do you know about cellular phone sales?”

Evidently, providing good customer service transcends knowledge of any singular product or service. I am sure U.S. Cellular is paying their call center executive a lot more than the Tire Rack or Jewelry Television is.

What happens in Vegas, gets messed up in Vegas

A call center I recently used that I thought would be of the utmost customer service was the reservations center for the Harrah's group of casinos (which include Caesars Palace, Flamingo, Paris, Rio, and Harrah's). The person was very good on the phone and explained the differences in room rates across the various casinos that are in the Harrah's group. We selected the Flamingo because we “were sold” that we could get a deluxe room for a much better rate.

We get to the Flamingo and after standing in a long reservations line we are told our room is a standard room. WHAT? The reservations agent told us we were getting a deluxe room with a 42-inch Plasma screen TV as well as other upgrades. “No, you have a standard room” was the curt reply.

The assistant front desk manager was adamant that we should only get a standard room even though I give her the reservations confirmation number and everything else I wrote down. “Sorry, it is entered as a standard room,” was the icy response.

Now I start thinking, “Wow! Bait and switch.” You get sold the Deluxe Gold room from the call center and when you show up tired and ready to drop your bags, sorry, you get a standard room. This is NOT the Vegas I know and I questioned it.

Luckily, all conversations are recorded on their reservations. The assistant manager said it will be five or 10 minutes to check on it but her attitude, her body language, and her general negativity reflects a feeling that the customer is just trying to get something they were never promised. You all have seen that and know the feeling.

It's like when you are in the grocery checkout line and the product rings up $2.99 and you know it was on sale at $1.99. When you protest, you are looked at like you are from another planet or worse, a criminal trying to steal. When the price check comes back $1.99, the clerk just keeps ringing things up, not even acknowledging that you were right to question the price. Chances are they don't even update the database. Maybe the next customer won't be paying attention to the items as they ring up.

Well, the Flamingo reservation checked out and the assistant manager coldly said, “Well, we have to check. You know it's policy. Besides, you are now getting what we promised.”

Getting what I was promised? Over a half hour went by and I did get what I reserved, but in the process, I felt like I was treated like a criminal.

We didn't get anything more. It used to be if someone made a mistake or kept you waiting, you would get a free drink, a dinner, something to show that they really cared about their clientele and that the mistake should have never happened.

Not only did we not get anything, when we checked out, they tried to add a $54 daily upgrade for the room. Good thing we did not do an express checkout. I said we went through this when we checked in. They apologized and took it off - AGAIN.

Quality service in Las Vegas? Fortunately, it is still there in other places that we patronized, but the Flamingo still has some work to do.

CARLINI-ISM: The Las Vegas standard for service is always set very high. Those that do not live up to it should not stay in business.

Recent articles by James Carlini

James Carlini: Data centers: Buyers beware of over-hyped facilities

James Carlini: Energy conservation might take us farther than renewable fuels

James Carlini: National broadband policy: Let's get it right this time

James Carlini: Data centers: Blowing smoke and raising red flags

James Carlini: Real pulse of the economy? Check real estate foreclosures

James Carlini is an adjunct professor at Northwestern University, and is president of Carlini & Associates. He can be reached at james.carlini@sbcglobal.net or 773-370-1888. Check out his blog at http://www.carliniscomments.com.

This article previously appeared in MidwestBusiness.com, and was reprinted with its permission.

The opinions expressed herein or statements made in the above column are solely those of the author, and do not necessarily reflect the views of Wisconsin Technology Network, LLC.

WTN accepts no legal liability or responsibility for any claims made or opinions expressed herein.

Comments

Jose responded 1 year ago: #1

I believe you are not fair in your opinion about U.S. Cellular, you can not base one retail or one experience like the company is like that. I use to be with Cingular (AT&T) and maybe you do not have a clue what is bad services and bad quality in the signal and the experience with the employees. Do you know other telecom company call center? Compare versus other telecom companies. U.S. Cellular is a great company with a great services, and I can bet you just have a really bad experience and in base of your writing you have a bad date. Remember if you get polite you can have more help. Are you sure you were not rude with the customer services? This is the first time I read about U.S. Cellular provide bad customer services and I really do not agree with you, because my experience is completely different.

Claire responded 1 year ago: #2

Jose is another example of someone within the industry attempting to make the customer out as being at fault for a poor experience. I have been in the call center and customer service industry for over 20 years, and YES, there is a total degradation of services over the last 10 years. It is rare to experience excellent service, and not to be made to feel as though you are in the wrong, as a consumer. One excellent company for customer service is Proflowers.com--aside from flowers, they also offer prime meats. I have used them the last several years exclusively because of their excellent customer service, and very fast resolution. Cutomers are made to feel valuable. What a novel concept.

James Carlini responded 1 year ago: #3

Jose, read the article again. I was more than fair. There were some people that were good - the first time there but they were also HAMPERED the second visit by the way the call center 800 number was set up at U.S. Cellular. AND JOSE - I hope you have a sense-of-urgency when you are working with customers. That is one of the BIGGEST problems I see with a lot of people.

Before you discount the article, did you ever design a call center? A mission critical call center like a 911 Center? Believe me - having the same 800 number for retail consultants to get help and technical assistance as they have for the general public is BAD Call Center design.

And I am tired of mediocre/bad service that is painted up as "Best Practices" by some glitzy marketing campaign. Sorry Jose - I call them the way I see them. If you can't handle that, I'm sorry.

Tom responded 1 year ago: #4

First, Tom is not my real name. I use a pseudonym because I am a professional educator who trains customer service representatives for Verizon Wireless. I can attest that the selection criteria for agents are minimal, that the training materials are silly and largely irrelevant to call center activity, and that the company keeps changing its mind on how it wants agents to handle customers. Agents are woefully unprepared when they hit the floor because the training activities have them making pretty posters, playing games, etc., but not learning how to effectively use the extensive computer resources at their disposal. All of this creates much internal frustration and consternation for the agents.

Call center quality is evaluated simply by comparing numbers from week to week and month to month, but with zero statistical validation. In other words, any increase or decrease in a customer survey score is considered significant without any statistical verificaiton of real sigificance. I suspect that most weekly and monthly changes in survey scores are simply due to chance.

Also, like Mr Carlini's experience, store reps and customer service reps too often give customers divergent information and there is one tier of customer service even for store reps.

It is my impression that, despite what VZW claims, little emphasis is put into customer service training and retention.

Poonam Sharma responded 1 year ago: #5

Iam very much convinced with what Tom says.
Its very correct.
I was working for Verizon Online DSL for 1 year.
Here nothing depends on your training or your own performance.
Whatever performance report you see is by chance.
The level of training is also not as per the issues which agents really face on the floor.
Everything just depends on the evaluation, which is of course by chance.
The major issues faced by customers as well as the agents are the scripts which they keep on changing as per their wish.
No one bothers if the customer is getting irrate by those scripts or not.
Companies should at least consider the feedback of the agents before changing or adding something in the script.
Because the agents are the only people who get in touch with the customers most of the time.
They will also have to change the method of training.
Also they should look upon the attrition rate going high in most of the call centers.

Steve responded 1 year ago: #6

I can't agree more with what Tom said. I have just left a major energy supplier in the UK at which I was a call centre agent. The service there is appalling, customers are laughed and joked about on a daily basis, even if the problems they are experiencing are pretty severe, such as having no gas or electricity. While there, I regularly had to leave new tennants without anything, even if they had children in the property, all because they didn't call 3 days before they moved in. I could quite easily have got an engineer out to sort the problem that day but it was "company policy" to leave these people in freezing cold houses with no electricity. This was the butt of many jokes and it sickened me how other agents were finding this amusing. The thought I now have on large companies is one of distrust, and I believe that a lot of the time things do not get done quickly because it would mean having to fill out another form.

-Add Your Comment

Name:
E-mail:

Comment Policy: WTN News accepts comments that are on-topic and do not contain advertisements, profanity or personal attacks. Comments represent the views of the individuals who post them and do not necessarily represent the views of WTN Media or our partners, advertisers, or sources.

WTN Media cannot accept liability for the content of comments posted here or verify their accuracy. If you believe this comment section is being abused, contact edit@wistechnology.com.

Advertisement
Advertisement

-More Stories

WTN Media Presents