Advertisement
*
Reproduction permitted for personal use only. For reprints and reprint permission, contact reprints@wistechnology.com.

State technology chief endorses new approach to IT management

Madison, Wis. - With the goal of putting an end to, or at least curtailing new and costly information technology implementation failures, the head of the state's Division of Enterprise Technology has issued a report that outlines new processes for information technology management in state agencies.

Referencing the 27-page report, titled "A New Approach to Information Technology Management," Oskar Anderson said the state is developing processes that will improve the performance of state agencies in delivering on expensive, high-risk IT implementations.

Anderson's report was compiled in response to a directive of the Legislative Audit Bureau, which earlier this year released a blistering audit identifying 184 information technology projects in state agencies - many of them plagued by delays and cost overruns - that cost a total of $291.7 million.

New standards

According to the audit bureau, most problems occurred in planning for complex, high-risk projects, and Anderson's report provided an update on recommendations to improve project planning, monitoring, and oversight.
Advertisement
The report includes progress on a recommendation to select, in collaboration with executive branch agencies, a prescribed format for agencies' annual strategic plans for IT, and a methodology for identifying high-risk projects. Anderson said the state has come up with a template for IT plans, one that can be updated "on the go" rather than on an annual basis.

In collaboration with executive branch agencies and the IT Directors' Council, Anderson also set out to establish planning standards for large, high-risk projects, which have proven difficult to manage. He said the state will use a combination of state and federal standards to come up with a definition of high-profile projects, including any implementation that carries $1 million or more in project costs.

The state also plans to mark high-risk projects with federal criteria such as:

• Those projects undertaken by a government agency that has not consistently demonstrated the ability to manage complex projects.

• Any project that is highly visible to the public, including those pertaining to public safety.

• Projects in which delays or failures would negatively affect the central mission of the agency.

IV&V treatment

To enhance project monitoring, Anderson has been in consultation with the IT Directors Council to develop a number of proposals to drive routine monitoring of high-profile projects. He said Wisconsin has developed an Independent Verification and Validation process in which personnel from other state agencies or, lacking that, a contractor would monitor projects in other agencies to determine whether there is anything "out of whack" with project management procedures or business-IT alignment.

The IV&V also would examine project documentation to ensure that implementations are delivering what was promised.

Anderson also was directed to establish policies for the use and monitoring of the state's master-lease program, which provides funding for agencies that need a capital financing mechanism for large IT projects. He said the Department of Administration, which includes the Division of Enterprise Technology, would issue an annual report on projects approved under the master-lease program, principle and interest paid, and which agencies have repaid debt.

Linda Barth, a spokeswoman for the DOA, said the state is attempting to create a better approach to IT management.

"Cumulatively, this shows there has been a high level of collaborative thought between the DOA and other state agencies to standardize how we proceed with these various IT projects," she said.

Barth noted the new processes are for IT projects going forward, which are in limbo because of the failure to adopt a new state budget. "We're wondering how many new projects will be going forward," she said.

Task masters

After wrapping up its investigation of state information technology failures, the Assembly Speaker's Task Force on those failures recommended the creation of a bureaucratic post, state chief information officer, as a way of introducing more accountability to IT implementations.

In contrast, the audit bureau recommended that the Legislature consider reactivating the Joint Committee on Information Policy and Technology and the IT Management Board.

The Task Force's recommendation came before news that an already-postponed overhaul of the Medicaid computing system is the latest state IT project to be set back by delays and higher costs. The state revealed last month that completion of the Medicaid Management Information System project, which is being implemented with contractor EDS Corp. of Dallas, would be delayed another three months.

The state also said that while cost savings still are expected to offset those higher expenses after the system is implemented, the total price tag had risen to $45.5 million on a project that originally was projected to cost $32.3 million.

The Medicaid Management Information System, which is supposed to run the state's health insurance program for poor residents, was one of several projects identified as needing additional monitoring. The federal government is absorbing 90 percent of the system's costs, while state taxpayers will pick up the rest.

Democratic alternative

Whereas the Speaker's Task Force, which is comprised of Assembly Republicans and members of the private sector, has suggested a state CIO, the Doyle Administration is concentrating more on standardizing policies and procedures across state agencies. Matt Canter, a spokesman for the Governor, said the best way to increase accountability is to hold contractor's accountable, and he said the state must find the expertise to negotiate computer contracts that protect taxpayer interests.

Related stories

Assembly Speaker's IT Task Force calls for state CIO

GOP, Dems split over funding of state technology projects

Technology audit rips poor planning and oversight

Oskar Anderson to succeed Miszewski as head of state technology division

Third Wave reports clinical growth, continued loss

Comments

Time to flip Data Center? responded 2 years ago: #1

Just read report hyperlinked in this article. Server consolidation has spent $40 million so far. $25 million more projected in FY08. Only $5 million to be recoverable. Leaving $60 million to be recovered as deficits over next 20 years. Don't know where the numbers came from, but this is what is cited in the report. The only business case for the project was cost savings. The objective was to minimally maintain the same level of service while costing less. Don't see how the state should let this project proceed, it has no business case. Berbee is building a new data center, perhaps they are looking for a good deal?

The numbers published in the report for email consolidation and IBIS don't look much better.

worker responded 2 years ago: #2

DOA is blowing smoke. Consolidation is a failure on several fronts. They certainly haven't saved anything, and the level of service hasn't been maintained.

It's time to get people in IT leadership that actually know how IT works in state government. There are many resources that could help - but none are near and dear to the heart of the Governor. As always - politicians play as their projects fail.

architect responded 2 years ago: #3

My initial read of the reported DOA plans is not very encouraging. It sounds like it will smother agile, effective initiatives, while not doing enough to detect and fix/halt big blundering money sinks...

I'm no manager, and have no suggestions about how to fix this. But I do have a pretty well-developed sense of how "oversight" of IT is often implemented in wrongheaded ways that don't actually accomplish the intended result.

I hope I'm wrong. This is a worthy goal.

Shawn Belling responded 2 years ago: #4

It's crazy to read about this ongoing saga. No one mentions that solid, basic project management practices embraced by experienced and certified professional project managers would help to prevent these fiascos. If the project management cannot be made independent of the politics, then the administrators and politicians must suffer the consequences.

Question from a taxpayer responded 2 years ago: #5

So, just how does the new approach to IT Management apply to server consolidation, email, and IBIS projects outlined in the report? Will the projects continue in light of what is being reported? I mean, spending $16 million dollars just to improve the Purchasing Requisitions/Purchase Order process (is this how a state employee makes a request to purchase something?) Seems like overkill? Can the state find better ways to spend $16 million dollars?

Can someone please tell me how the new approaches outlined will affect server consolidation, email, and IBIS? How many other projects like this are going on? It seems projects like managing welfare benefits, or related to public safety, or reducing dependencies on fossil fuels, etc. cost less and should be of higher priority. Let's put the $16 million to work on those kinds of things rather then on improving the process of how a state employee requests something to buy.

state worker responded 2 years ago: #6

Oskar had to issue some kind of report; LAB required it. All he is doing is hiring really expensive and more managers to surround himself with. Consolidation is about the same as musical chairs, moving people all around (lessens accountability, who did what?), and hustling to move as many servers out to the new data center as quickly as possible so as to make it look like they are doing something. Again.., cronyism is rampant within DOA/DET.

Why do you think nothing is getting done so darn fast? We've created a gang of managers who practically refuse to work with the employees.

Concerned Taxpayer (Sun Prairie Region) responded 2 years ago: #7

Let's call the kettle black and quite insulting taxpayers. Here's the deal.

#1 - Where the Beef?
The report is really more for show then actions. Oskar Anderson has been CIO of the Department of Administration Division of Enterprise Technology (DOA DET) for over 6 months and what has he accomplished?

Accomplishment #1 - Slowed state progress down to a cripple.
It's pretty easy if you're the State CIO to stop/slow state projects and take credit and call it progress. However the true grade is what's done after and can be called "completed." Mr. Anderson fails to make the grade on this mark. Thanks for wasting my tax money. At least the last guy in charge had projects moving (a little too fast, not efficiently and cost effectively, but they were not dead in the water).

Accomplishment #2 - Created a report that says I promise to be a part of the problem by adding more bureaucracy and less operating efficiency (In English: "I'm going to put a process in place that will slow things down until I retire (which is soon). That way it's not my problem. Again thanks for wasting my tax dollars (why did you take the job?)

#2 - IV and V Approach
This is the touted "Independent Verification and Validation Approach" that is suppose to save the state more money and increase the time lines to accomplish anything of value. I guess it should not matter for Mr. Anderson, since accomplishment is not his objective (more...let's add more red tape so I can eventually retire before it becomes my problem). The IV and V approach acronym is a joke. Let's call it what it really stands for "Idiots Vision of Value."

#3 - Where is the Leadership?
Has anyone looked at Mr. Anderson's history.

History #1 - Sure he's the former IT Director for the Department of Revenue. Great! Hey wait a minute, wasn't Mr. Anderson the guy in charge during one of the worst DOR debacles. That was the time that the Social Security numbers were being printed on addresses and mailed to the general public. Wow he must be a big security fan. I'm glad we are giving him a bigger playground to be responsible for.

History #2 - IT Director Council Member - http://itdirectors.wi.gov
I hope he's not getting orders/advice from this group. They don't even keep their website updated. They have been meeting for years, what have they accomplished? Hmm...let's put things on paper and "not follow it" approach to leadership with a dash of "no accountability" recipe. Sounds good!

History #3 - Fluffy Leadership
Now if I were CIO for a day, I would hope the first thing I would figure out is how the prior CIO lost his job so I could avoid repeating the same problem. Here's some advice if Mr. Anderson is hoping to save the taxpayers money.

Advice #1 - Change your management team (Keep the good managers get rid of the cream puffs).
Why has Mr. Anderson management team at the DOA not changed? The same people who gave bad advice to the prior CIO are continuing to give advice to the new CIO. Is Mr. Anderson foolish or just very naive (don't lead by a majority vote, lead by doing what's right)?

Advice #2 - Who's Really the Boss?
It's apparent another manager (within DET) holds all the cards (Not Mr. Anderson). Come on, be brave and step up to the plate and make the management changes so it's apparent "you are in charge." Don't be scared of the politics, follow your morale principles of "doing the right thing" or else it's time to have someone else in charge.

Advice #3 - Listen
I noticed a lot of IT staff (state/public) making negative comments within the blogs. Listen to them and stop listening to the people "sucking up" to you. (It appears your management is looking after their own interest, not the state taxpayers interest).

Advice #4 - Efficient Workforce
To accomplish that state IT goals, you need a great workforce. Improve the State IT workforce by getting away from expensive contracting services and train state employees to do their jobs and help them maintain their knowledge base. Get away from contract employees that come and go taking the knowledge base with them. Like in any IT organization, you have good and bad employees. Work with your union and executive management to:

- Reduce your reliance on expensive contract IT staff and contract managers.
- Promote rewarding staff bringing organizational success.
- Recruit the best and brightest to work for your organization.
- Get rid of the dead weight employees (resistant to change) and riding the state tax dollar for a free ride.

Advice #5 - Stop the Scandal Activities
The state has lost too much money. You can bet plenty of misconduct in DET has led to this. I'm guessing if you look hard enough, several DET staff have violated enough state policy and procedures that would make the Chuck Chvala scandal for "misconduct in office" look silly. It's time to do the right thing before the Wisconsin State Journal, Capitol times (and other newspapers), and the Wisconsin Court System does if for you. (It's not that hard of a paper trail to follow).

In conclusion, it's time for Mr. Anderson to be a leader or step down. Taxpayers have lost enough money. We don't need another example of process, procedures, and negotiations similar to the budget battle (budget debacle) being dragged out for months/years impacting the well being of the state taxpayers.

A Consultant responded 2 years ago: #8

This is rich. $40 million spent to date and only 149 servers have been consolidated into Femrite. An additional $25 million to be spent this year to get how many agencies into Femrite? How much more will be spent on business continuity? The Femrite location seems awfully close to an Interstate highway and it only took one bomb to tear down the Murra Building in Okalahoma City. I wonder if the priorities are muddled.

Another citizen responded 2 years ago: #9

To Mr. Belling's point that professional Project Managers would these sorts of failures, please understand Independent Validation and Verification (IV&V) done by the Feds (notably the DoD) is not what is outlined in this report. Federal/DoD IV&V is a rigorous process that essentially duplicates a vendors QA/Test systems to ensure the product developed for the Government meets published REQUIREMENTS (i.e. the system shall do with

hmmm responded 2 years ago: #10

The whole computer industry has advanced by NOT consolidating to a 'mainframe model' of doing things for it's own sake. The key is to standardize better server reuse and project management regardless of where they are located, and the cheapest location is where they are now. Putting all the server and project eggs in one basket is a sure recipe for having one server or project impact the others unnecessarily, plus the highly increased risk of breaking a lot of eggs at once in a location-specific disaster instead of a few.

Herbert responded 2 years ago: #11

The state of Wisconsin's goal of centralizing government functions appears disjointed right at the top.

Saying he wants to streamline state government through ACE, the Governor has spent millions to centralize IT functions with very little, if any, savings. Yet, the Governor now supports creating new agencies and massive healthcare initiatives - which is not streamlining government, but expanding it. That's politics!

Stop the bleeding. Change the plan. Does the cost and associated inefficiencies to physically and logically centralize well-operating governmnet functions for large agencies - purchasing, IT, payroll, etc. - make good business sense? Not at all.

Would it make sense to focus on helping the state's small agencies benefit from technolgy resources that they cannot afford alone? Ask them, I bet they say yes it would.

Leave the major, well-operating agencies and the UW alone to manage their own program services and related functions, including the IT function.

If project oversight is required on all significant projects at agencies, then hire someone to do that who reports directly to the CIO. Keep IV&V truly 'independent.' Don't put state staff in a position that may end up pitting state agencies against each other. Agencies need to work together.

Justice responded 2 years ago: #12

Finally!! People bringing forward comments about the corruption in the DOA DET Kingdom; it won’t be long before the newspapers uncover the real truth. I can’t wait to see it on the news.

It sounds like this CIO sounds appears to walk around clueless because his subjects (AKA the Managers) are too corrupt (or too dumb) to tell the truth.

This storyline has all the makings of a familiar Hans Christian Andersen fairy tale about the Emperor's New Clothes. This CIO walks around naked and is not bright enough to realize it.

-Add Your Comment

Name:
E-mail:

Comment Policy: WTN News accepts comments that are on-topic and do not contain advertisements, profanity or personal attacks. Comments represent the views of the individuals who post them and do not necessarily represent the views of WTN Media or our partners, advertisers, or sources. Comments are moderated and not immediately posted. Your email address will not be posted.

WTN Media cannot accept liability for the content of comments posted here or verify their accuracy. If you believe this comment section is being abused, contact edit@wistechnology.com.

Advertisement
Advertisement

-More Stories

WTN Media Presents