Advertisement
*
Reproduction permitted for personal use only. For reprints and reprint permission, contact reprints@wistechnology.com.

Wisconsin hospitals not shirking investment in health information technology

Madison, Wis. - Nearly 90 percent of Wisconsin hospitals have implemented several key information technologies (HIT), according to report released by the Wisconsin Hospital Association.

The report, based on a survey of 122 acute care hospitals, focused on 16 healthcare information technology systems in use in today's hospitals. The applicable technologies include advancements in the way medications are tracked and delivered to the patient, the ability to bring laboratory and medical imaging results into the computerized patient chart, and electronic patient records that can be accessed even when the physician is not physically in the hospital.

Nearly 90 percent of Wisconsin's hospitals report that they have either partially or fully implemented five or more key HIT systems. Almost 40 percent report a high adoption rate and a total of 76 percent report moderate or high level of HIT use.

Other implementations are in the planning stage. For example, the survey showed that nearly half of Wisconsin hospitals are in the planning stage for a bedside medication verification system, while 46 percent have fully or partially implemented this safety technology.

The survey had a 100 percent response rate. The full report is available on the WHA Web site.
Advertisement
Regarding the spectrum if HIT use, 40 percent of hospitals had either fully or partially implemented 13-16 systems; 36 percent have fully or partially implemented 9-12 systems; 14 percent have fully or partially implemented five to eight systems; and 10 percent are getting started with zero to four systems.

In terms of electronic medical records, which integrate data gleaned from multiple HIT systems, 41 percent of Wisconsin hospitals have either fully or partially implemented EMRs, and 21 percent have fully implemented all the HIT systems that contribute to an EMR.

Among the systems that feed data to EMRs are the core master patient index database, lab information systems, pharmacy systems, enterprise medication administration records, radiology information systems, order entry and results, and inpatient charting.

Dana Richardson, WHA vice president of quality initiatives, said in a release that the ability of physicians and nurses to access a patient's complete medical history, as they receive information about the patient's current illness, is revolutionizing medicine. “Rapid access to a patient's medical history is improving decision-making, which is one of the most important reasons to make the investment in information technology,” she said.

Hospitals are aware of these advantages, but cost remains a leading barrier to adoption. In 2006, the American Hospital Association pegged the median purchase cost of HIT at $5,000 per bed, per year and operating costs of $12,000 per bed, per year.

WHA President Steve Brenton said hospitals can't do it alone. “All health care system participants who benefit - patients, employers, government programs, and insurers - have a stake in this investment,” he said.

Comments

Jack Lohman responded 3 months ago: #1

Now, that makes a lot of sense. SIXTEEN different database systems that may or may not be compatible, and all very expensive contracts or internal development costs.

These 16 hospitals could have obtained the FREE, highly respected Open Source VistA system from the VA Hospital and ensured compatibility amongst them. It is already complete and it WORKS!

Is it any wonder that our health care system is the most costly in the world? Is it any wonder that employers and insurers are now looking to medical tourism, sending employees to other countries where their hospital costs are as little as 10% of what they are here?

See: "Hospitals are becoming part of the problem" at http://tinyurl.com/5us63e

Jack Lohman
http://MoneyedPoliticians.net

Matt Rose responded 3 months ago: #2

Boeing doesn't look to all who benefit from its airplanes pay for them. It looks for the airline to pay for the plane. They are the customer!
Hospitals deliver a service to patients who should be the ultimate customer.
Employer paid insurance should be eliminated and replaced with the ability for patients to select plans. They do it every day with Auto and Home insurance.

Another problem here is what to the $5, 000 and $12,000 numbers come from? What has HIT replaced in terms of labor costs?
If they have saved $10,000 per bed per year the investment is justified.


WHA President Steve Brenton said hospitals can't do it alone. “All health care system participants who benefit - patients, employers, government programs, and insurers - have a stake in this investment,” he said.

Homer responded 3 months ago: #3

On compatibility: health care businesses have never demanded compatibility/interoperability of IT systems because they are businesses and compete with each other. The patient needs to be the customer in order for them to have their needs met. Healthcare needs to be placed above profits. A national healthcare system would make interoperability a nobrainer. Also, maybe someday someone will provide a study that shows that today's high-priced HIT systems actually save patients money or improve healthcare. Still waiting...

Diane responded 3 months ago: #4

As part of the healthcare IT arena, you can believe that hospitals find the lack of interoperability just as frustrating as Jack Lohman.

The multiple databases have become the standard due to vendor inability to integrate database design with the varying requirements of various hospital departments and the needs of inpatient vs. outpatient care.

The database design is further complicated by the regulatory and payor requirements.

I believe that the reason the VA system can work is that for the most part, there is no need to reconcile the clinical care data needs with the billing data needs. The ability to use the VA system in the general industry is therefore not a "slam dunk".

Just my 2 cents.

-Add Your Comment

Name:
E-mail:

Comment Policy: WTN News accepts comments that are on-topic and do not contain advertisements, profanity or personal attacks. Comments represent the views of the individuals who post them and do not necessarily represent the views of WTN Media or our partners, advertisers, or sources.

WTN Media cannot accept liability for the content of comments posted here or verify their accuracy. If you believe this comment section is being abused, contact edit@wistechnology.com.

Advertisement
Advertisement
WTN Media Presents