Advertisement
*
Reproduction permitted for personal use only. For reprints and reprint permission, contact reprints@wistechnology.com.

WARF responds to rejection of European patent claims

Source: Wisconsin Alumni Research Foundation
November 29, 2008
[PRESS RELEASE]
Madison, Wis. - The Wisconsin Alumni Research Foundation issued the following statement following the rejection of its stem cell patent claims before the European Patent Office.

“The Wisconsin Alumni Research Foundation (WARF) is disappointed in the decision of the Enlarged Board of Appeal of the European Patent Office (EPO) rejecting the claims of WARF's European Patent Application No. 96903521.1. WARF currently is considering various options in response to this decision.

“WARF emphasizes that this ruling by the EPO Enlarged Board of Appeal was based on European Union patent rules that are peculiar to Europe. There is no counterpart in United States patent law and therefore the EPO decision does not in any way affect WARF's patent rights in the United States.

"We have more than 40 issued patents directed to stem cells in 12 countries with more than 200 cases pending all over the world," states WARF General Counsel Michael Falk. "This decision represents a ruling in just one of these cases and in just one jurisdiction on grounds that do not apply in other jurisdictions."

According to WARF, the opinion of the Enlarged Board of Appeal focused on the issue of the patentability of cells made using an embryo. “The Board made no determination of the patentability of claims based on any of the traditional criteria used to assess patentability - usefulness, novelty, and non-obviousness. In fact, the opinion makes clear that its decision does not address the question of patentability in general of inventions relating to human stem cell cultures.”

Comments

Duncan Williams responded 1 year ago: #1

Someone needs to inform the doctors at WARF that the GATT-TRIPS treaty prohibits enforcement of medical procedure patents. See Article 27 of GATT. WARF is fighting a loosing battle in seeking patent coverage of medical procedures, and my guess is that the patents are simply a marketing ploy. Since the patents aren't enforceable, they aren't even worth the money it takes to hire patent counsel to defend them at the USPTO or other patent offices around the world. Someone needs to clue these "doctors" in on the law.

-Add Your Comment

Name:
E-mail:

Comment Policy: WTN News accepts comments that are on-topic and do not contain advertisements, profanity or personal attacks. Comments represent the views of the individuals who post them and do not necessarily represent the views of WTN Media or our partners, advertisers, or sources. Comments are moderated and not immediately posted. Your email address will not be posted.

WTN Media cannot accept liability for the content of comments posted here or verify their accuracy. If you believe this comment section is being abused, contact edit@wistechnology.com.

Advertisement
Advertisement
WTN Media Presents