Advertisement
*
Reproduction permitted for personal use only. For reprints and reprint permission, contact reprints@wistechnology.com.

Innovation at fault?

First the real estate bubble popped. Then subprime mortgages imploded taking down Bear Sterns, Lehman Brothers, Merrill Lynch, and Washington Mutual and rocking the boat for other major worldwide players such as AIG and UBS. Then it was the fault of Wall Street greed (Bernie Madoff, et al). Most recently the blame is being placed at the door of the US auto industry.

So, we’ve established that there is enough blame to spread around. But what if all of this was symptomatic of a more systemic, underlying problem? What if most of these players were casualties of a fundamental problem with our economy - a problem that no amount of economic stimulus can fix?

That’s the essential point made in last week’s BW cover story about the general lack of innovation across the board from health care to manufacturing. It’s also one of the cornerstones of my latest book The Innovation Zone. Early in the book I talk about how relatively few advances have been made in fields, such as cancer therapies, despite an unprecedented amount of research and money being thrown at the problem.

So, what gives? How can we be falling behind in the area of innovation at a time when we are surrounded by more technology and gadgets than ever before? Simple. Innovation is about creating value not just more stuff. We’ve become great at creating stuff while we seem to have lost sight of how we create value.

GM and Chrysler had no problem rolling new models of automobiles faster than new matchbox cars. But they were lousy at creating vehicles that created new value for consumers.
Advertisement
The odd thing about creating value is that it most often comes from the bottom of the pyramid rather than the top. Large corporates are great at scaling new innovations but they are the worst place to look for creating new value. Value comes from new ideas, and thee come from start-ups. And, due to the nature of the current credit crisis, that’s the one part of our economy that is suffering most today when it comes to jump starting a recovery.

If we want innovation we need to pay attention to the place ideas take shape - small business.

Tom Koulopoulos is founder of Delphi Group, executive director of the Babson College Center for Business Innovation, and the author of seven books. You can contact him at his blog www.tomkoulopoulos.com.

The opinions expressed herein or statements made in the above column are solely those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of WTN Media LLC.

Comments

sue responded 4 months ago: #1

Robbery, illegal, fraud, taking of us citezens rights and money America as we know it is gone. gm is gonning to keep doing the same crap, we will loose, and have lost billion. any clue where thge billions have gone already, as the factories are closed this summer. how can you loose thses many billions and not build cars, seems like a saving time, not a spending time. LEt GM go BK, give a new group a turn at it. Also, been a good time to rid GM of paying $70/hr labor, as lots of people are looking to work. Why not take this time to reduce labor cost? While in bankruptcy, could drop some high labor contracts,m replace with regular labor rates. Seems this fake like bankruptcy is not doing what it could to help out GM.

Kay Plantes responded 4 months ago: #2

I think Tom's point is right on. Sure there are exceptions---I think of 3M and Gore as large companies that got innovation right. In pharma, drug discover is moving outside the giants. Still large companies have a strategic need to become more innovative. They'll achieve greater success with acquisitions they made and they will forestall the natural commoditization of more mature offerings. The most important innovation that large companies can make is in their business model.
http://www.plantescompany.com/blog/

Scott responded 4 months ago: #3

The central argument that Tom is putting forward is that reduced money (by way of the current economic environment) available to small business has retarded innovation. While I agree that innovation is declining, I am not sure I fully agree with Tom’s theory; I would counter with the fact that during the great depression, there was no shortage of innovation (Boston Consulting group did a study on this, among others). Necessity is the Mother of invention, not funding...although, money certainly can't hurt. Culturally speaking, perhaps we do not yet have enough of what my Grandmother called “Gumption”. I would also offer another line of sight on why innovation is stagnating; look at the pool of talent. The number of college graduates going into hard science in the US as been steadily declining for two decades. I predict this will get worse before it gets better; there is no cash bailout for innovation.

-Add Your Comment

Name:
E-mail:

Comment Policy: WTN News accepts comments that are on-topic and do not contain advertisements, profanity or personal attacks. Comments represent the views of the individuals who post them and do not necessarily represent the views of WTN Media or our partners, advertisers, or sources. Comments are moderated and not immediately posted. Your email address will not be posted.

WTN Media cannot accept liability for the content of comments posted here or verify their accuracy. If you believe this comment section is being abused, contact edit@wistechnology.com.

Advertisement
Advertisement
WTN Media Presents