What happens when you decide to let anyone leave comments on any website they visit? Google Sidewiki.
Although Google Sidewiki isnt the first attempt by a company to integrate its comment system into the browsing experience, with the weight of Google and its popular toolbar behind it, its the first one thats likely to succeed.
Is Google Sidewiki a helpful? That depends. How much faith you have in content generated by others?
After installing the Google Toolbar, I visited the official Apple website to experience Google Sidewiki firsthand. When I did, a top-rated Sidewiki post from Sapere Aude, a student, welcomed me to the site:
“This is the official website of Apple Inc., formerly Apple Computer, Inc. It provides promotions for its products, advertisements (including the company’s television ads), and product support information. It was registered by the company on February 19, 1987. If you want to see how apple.com looked in the past, visit http://web.archive.org/web/*/apple.com.”
Not bad.
Thereafter, however, the quality of posts went downhill fast. They were chaotic, SPAM-filled, and virtually useless. As examples, here are the first five:
“I Love Apple – I love the Apple web site!” from Noodles Guru. (SPAM from Noodles & Company)
“TrendsettingSite – Apple has historically been know to innovate and their website is no different. There are innovative features all over. From sprites to great photography, Apple.com is an industry leader in web design.” Ryan Murphy. (Suspicious entry from a user with no profile. Perhaps an Apple employee?)
“LoveApple:Wishmytrackpadworkedthough – Love Apple and my new Macbook Pro 13 inch … too bad that the trackpad stopped registering physical clicks just after 2 months of use. Still waiting with lots of other customers for some sort of response from Apple.” Pako Lupo. (Complaint)
“Comment to Cuprohastes Dvanatrinodantan – With reference to Cuprohastes Dvanatrinodantan’s entry above… Although, it may seem dramatic to end users, it is perfectly natural that a product which is produced at $200 is sold for $600 in retail. LG, Samsung, Motorola, Nokia, they would all use the same kind of mark up. The focus of Cuprohastes Dvanatrinodantan’s entry is a bit misguided.” Lars Rosengren. (SPAM)
“SideWiki-Justtestingthisout.” Derek J. (Junk)
While these initial SideWiki entries I viewed for Apple are discouraging, Google Sidewiki includes capabilities for users to report abuse and rate whether or not individual entries are useful. Theoretically, this means that poorly-conceived entries (like those above) should sink to the bottom as higher-quality comments are added. The overall quality of entries for most websites should improve over time as traffic from Google Toolbar traffic increases.
Advertisement
In the meantime, Sidewiki requires Google Toolbar users to be well mannered and active. And, it requires website owners to be diligent and transparent.
A tall order.
Leave Your Mark
If you want to leave your mark on the world without using Google Sidewiki, consider the art of graffiti. This tutorial can get you started.
Troy Janisch, Publisher of Social Meteor, is a digital marketing professional and social media enthusiast. Previous projects? Until 2009, he was publisher of the Business Owners Toolkit and host of its nationally-syndicated radioshow of the same name.
The opinions expressed herein or statements made in the above column are solely those of the author, and do not necessarily reflect the views of Wisconsin Technology Network, LLC.
WTN accepts no legal liability or responsibility for any claims made or opinions expressed herein.
Side wiki will be used to spam people and give them viruses. There is no "opt-out" feature. The only way to stop it showing is with javascript like at www.sidewikispam.com
Wigington responded 50 days ago:
#2
It does not happen often, but I have to disagree with you on this one Troy. I do not think that Google will be able to effectively block the spam, trolls, haters, and competitors that will write negative posts. And what is most disturbing to me, is that google is high-jacking sites without the owners permission. At this point a casual reader may think that the comments are authorized by the author. An opt-out, or for that matter making the system op-in, would be the better way to approach this new technology.
Jeanne Lisse responded 49 days ago:
#3
Google needs to pull this product immediately!! This is possibly the most irresponsible product Google (or anyone) have released to date.
The inevitable abuse and malware that will ensue from this makes Google negligent and possibly liable for the slander and malware they will be opening the world to.
It appears from our testing, that one can embed php, html and website links!
Choosing to "opt-out" will destroy your website's analytics. Also, since there is a separate Sidewiki for each page, one would be spending a lot of time "opting out" for the dozens or hundreds or pages on their site.
Add Your Comment
Comment Policy: WTN News accepts comments that are on-topic and do not
contain advertisements, profanity or personal attacks. Comments represent
the views of the individuals who post them and do not necessarily represent
the views of WTN Media or our partners, advertisers, or sources. Comments are moderated and not immediately posted. Your email address will not be posted.
WTN Media cannot accept liability for the content of comments posted
here or verify their accuracy. If you believe this comment section is
being abused, contact edit@wistechnology.com.
Disclaimer: Wisconsin Technology Network, LLC, and its agents used their best efforts in collecting and preparing the information published herein. However, Wisconsin Technology Network, LLC, does not assume, and hereby disclaims, any and all liability for any loss or damage caused by errors or omissions, whether such errors or omissions resulted from negligence, accident, or other causes.
Reach a focused, executive-level audience with purchasing power.
Build your brand among technology-focused executives and managers.
Start advertising on WTN News today.