Advertisement
*
Reproduction permitted for personal use only. For reprints and reprint permission, contact reprints@wistechnology.com.

An open letter to Sprint CEO — Is Sprint improving customer service?

Columnist Note: In an open letter to Sprint CEO,Dan Hesse: Does Mr. Hesse really believe that Sprint is improving customer service? Not from our experiences. A multi-part experience nightmare! Part one.

Am I the only one completely confused and upset with Sprint's poor customer service? My experience involves them selling products under false pretense, breach of contract and not honoring sales claims by Sprint's sales and customer support representatives. Perhaps it's time for us as consumer to rise and file another Class Action Law Suit. (In August Sprint had to to pay $15M to settle its most recent case.) Haven't you had enough? In today's world, customer satisfaction and retention are the keys to a company's survival. Sprint is selling off its cell towers to raise money to sustain operations. Laying off employees and outsourcing its workforce to foreign countries and losing more customers than any other cellular carrier. Perhaps that is a major reason the company is in a really poor cash position. Sprint's actions impact its' shareholders and well as its customers. Mr. Hesse, please respond to let us help you.


Dear Mr. Hesse, Sprint Board of Directors, et al.

Dan Hesse
I am writing this open letter to you and the community at large as your public relations department would not schedule a timely interview with you or an executive member of your management team to address the following issues. They have referred me to your executive offices in an attempt to fix issues that many of my readers and I have experienced. I do not know if you know what is going on in your company. Ever since the merger with Nextel, I have been writing this column, but have held off publishing it, to give the company fair time to improve. I think over two years is enough. It's fun, but unnerving to watch you on TV commercials saying that Sprint has worked hard to improve customer service. Not true! A search of “Sprint Customer Service” on You Tube reveals 2,139 poor customer service videos. I will make it easy for you to see this search, just “Click here.”

But, I am not the first to send you an open letter, just perform a Google search on your name, or click here. After your executive bio the number two Google search result for “Dan Hesse Sprint” is from a posting on web site SprintSucks.com.
Advertisement
Have you ever done a Google Search with the phrase “Sprint poor customer experience?” There are only 524,000 results for that phrase. Again, let me make it easy for you to review this before you make any more commercials instead of fixing the problem, just click here. The top result is from MSN Money titled “The Customer Service Hall of Shame”. “The results are in, and one company ranks below all the rest: Sprint Nextel, one of the country's largest wireless-phone carriers. A remarkable 40% of people who had an opinion of Sprint's customer service said it was poor. And Sprint was hardly the exception. All of the companies that ranked in our Bottom 10 had customer service rated "poor" by at least 20% of the respondents who expressed an opinion about their service."

Beginning in July 2007, after your merger with Nextel, your information technology integration and failure to properly integrate your billing and customer service has been widely reported in the press. Your company failure to manage the consumer experience, and spending millions of dollars on failed information technology integration projects and a failed roll out of Wi-Max service has severely impacted your shareholders and customers are left holding the bag.

I welcome my readers to report their experiences, as I have spent in excess of 45 hours on the phone with your customer service and executive offices to issue credits for radically incorrect billing overcharges, not just once or twice, but almost every month for almost two years. I have had many false and misleading statements made to me and I have them all documented and recorded.

“You have been made false and misleading statements and sold a product under false pretense,” said a call center supervisor (employee number LZ613769). This is a Sprint employee's statement, not mine but, I could not have put it better myself. Yesterday, I spoke with Hasan Seif, executive services analyst, and his behavior and lack of ability to resolve my issues have been unconscionable. You can call Mr. Seif. His direct line at (817) 215-3143.

Here is a new issue for your review as an example. On October 24, 2009, I spoke with employee AU414751 in regard to activating the Sierra Wireless Card I had just purchased with a replacement for a lost one. During the call the representative offered to sell me a Hero or Palm Pre phone w/rebate. She said I qualified for a discounted phone with rebate because I had not used the upgrade option for my broadband card phone number. I selected and ordered the Sprint Hero and just received it. I specifically asked your employee to look at my account and asked if this would effect all the credits, contract and account adjustments that I just spent weeks working with your team to resolve. I wanted to confirm that this order would not result in any activation fees or new contract periods except for the broadband card service. She confirmed those concerns and said all I would need to pay was a $15 data plan and could swap any of my non-contract phones for the new one. She sold the upgrade very hard. When I called recently and spoke with a call center representative and then a supervisor with employee number LZ613769, I was told they could not honor that offer and the phone was sold under a false pretense.

Dan, lets talk. Please give me call or send me an e-mail. I have sent this to your public relations team and a review of my account will reveal two years of calls and thousand of dollars of credit issued back to me as a result of poor business practices by Sprint. I am sure the community and I would like to help Sprint. You have some new and exciting products that were just released on the market, but you will not survive or prosper as a company unless you are in direct contact with your customers and run an honest business.

Mike Klein is Editorial Director for WTN News. His views do not represent the views of WTN Media. The Small Business Administration has also named Mr. Klein, “ Journalist of the Year 2009 - Region 5.”

The opinions expressed herein or statements made in the above column are solely those of the author, and do not necessarily reflect the views of Wisconsin Technology Network, LLC. WTN accepts no legal liability or responsibility for any claims made or opinions expressed herein.

Comments

Tom responded 15 days ago: #1

Sprint isn't alone. Having worked as a trainer and quality assurance professional for Verizon Wireless, I can add a few things. First, phone-based customer service is often contracted out to companies like Sitel, who hire unqualified individuals and do not fire under-performing or problem CS reps. I had one guy in a class who faked his employment exam in order to get a passing grade, but when this was discovered, he was kept on. A number of reps, sitting next to each other would answer calls and immediately re-route them back into the queue so they could go on talking to each other. Reps were not fired for using profanity on the phones or for continually messing up customer accounts.

You would think that the contracting company and the mobile provider would want to eliminate these bad actors. Here is why they don't. Sitel condones such behavior because they need bodies, lots of them. They get paid per call, so their motivation is to handle as many as possible, quality be damned. Verizon does nothing for a long while because they are being lied to by their contractors. In quality-assessment teleconferences between VZW and Sitel, the only calls listened to were those taken by the (very few) high performing agents leaving VZW with a false sense of satisfaction. Only when VZW began listening in random calls was action taken. And the Madison Sitel site lost its VZW contract and eventually closed.

M responded 15 days ago: #2

I had a bad experience. I have a Palm Pre and recently bought another one for my wife and we switched to a Palm Pre. I bought my Pre at retail off of eBay so I didn't have to extend my contract which ends in a few months. I spent hours on the phone to resolve another issue and in the end I was offered a $20 "service credit" for 24 months. My first question was whether my contract would be extended if I accepted. I specifically mentioned that I didn't want my contract extended and the representative assured me that it wouldn't be the case and even if I accepted the service credit, the contract would end next year as it was scheduled to. I accepted the service credit and after a few days when I was checking my account online, I discovered to my horror that my contract had been extended through Oct 2011. I was furious and after calling them back and speaking with several supervisors, all I got was a one-time credit for $65. I was lied to and this is extremely unethical on Sprint just to make up their numbers. I hope Sprint gets sued for this, I would be a part of it.

Chris responded 14 days ago: #3

Sprint customer service continues to be their down fall. I have been trying to resolve a coverage issue with them for over two months with no resolution in site. I own a Palm Pre and while I loved the phone, the signal quality in my area is deplorable-constantly losing signal, the phone not switching to roaming, losing GPS. They even sent me an airave device for my home at their cost and I am being credited every month for that service. I could go on. I eventually moved over to AT&T. I now have quality coverage and their customer service is head and shoulders above Sprint. I am wondering how much longer Sprint can remain in business as they continue to lose customers and fail to improve their customer service. We will probably hear about them needing a bailout in the next few months....

Mike responded 12 days ago: #4

It just seems interesting to me that the writer mentions the poor cash position that sprint is in and then is upset that they wont honor a deal that they would clearly loose money on. Sure the economy is down, but last i checked most wireless companies are not "nonprofits'. The reality is, that NO WIRELESS company in america is going to give you a smartphone with out a contract extension or activation fee. Thats like owning a ford and then the dealership upgrading you to a new one for nothing at all. We all know that wouldn't happen, but i don't see any open letters being sent to ford. The real problem with sprints customer care is the unfortunate reality that people who receive good service expect it, so they do not make a big deal of it; conversely people who receive what they perceive to be poor customer service write articles about it and post it online.

Roni responded 11 days ago: #5

Dear Mr. Klein:

While our privacy policy means we will not be able to address the specifics of your account in a public forum, we do think it's important that your readers know that we have been working with you to address the larger issues raised in your post about Sprint.

We are also working to improve the customer experience at Sprint and our working is paying off. For the last 7 quarters we've improved our customer satisfaction scores. Most importantly, we're working to increase the number of cases where we resolve the customer's issue on their first call into customer service.

In addition to improving our customer care, we've also improved the experience our customers have at Sprint retail stores, online and in our service and repair centers. Recently, a University of Michigan study found that Sprint made the most improvement in year-over-year customer satisfaction scores among the top wireless carriers.

We're also working with your neighbors in Wisconsin to improve our customer' experience with Sprint. In 2007, we opened a Sprint call center in West Salem, Wisc. which is helping us to meet the needs of our customers across the country.

We understand that none of our progress matters to you as long as there are outstanding issues on your account. But just as we are committed to resolving the issues on your account, we are committed to doing everything we can to give all of our customers a great experience with Sprint.

Roni Singleton
Sprint PR

thetruthaboutit responded 4 days ago: #6

Roni you are drinking the Sprint Koolaid. Go back to your HR desk at 6500 Sprint Parkway, file your nails because you need the sharp points once you figure out how to screw additional customers and dig those nails into the back of employees. I know, its a thankless job. If anyone that needs to go, its the Sprint management and HR drones draining the life out of Sprint thinking they know what's best.

Remember back in 2004 when Forsee had Sprint take out a full page spread in the Kansas City Star and in 2005 USA Today proclaiming the "best network ever"? When is that absurd PR campaign ever going away? Similar to Bush proclaiming victory standing in front of the "Mission Accomplished" banner. This is not the first time I've heard about MKE getting "special treatment" to resolve ongoing problems.

Tickets received within executive services are never worked to completion. Reports are kicked around and eventually closed. If a network RF problem occurs, a website map is given a tickmark relevant to the nearest cell site and a dear john response is sent to the customer. Nothing happens after that point. Complacency is the biggest disease of Sprint. Any customer duped into believing otherwise from a perfectly crafted response from a Sprint PR drone, who does not even work in the area of network or billing for that matter, is a fool.

The fact that Sprint lost a 3rd tier reseller such as Qwest speaks volumes. Disney also left and lets not forget about Virgin Mobile. Look at how the cable partner venture turned out. So if B2B's experience a tough time working with Sprint, why would an individual subscriber want to stick around? Sprint management and HR milk the employee and customer base and now both are voting with their feet and its way overdue.

-Add Your Comment

Name:
E-mail:

Comment Policy: WTN News accepts comments that are on-topic and do not contain advertisements, profanity or personal attacks. Comments represent the views of the individuals who post them and do not necessarily represent the views of WTN Media or our partners, advertisers, or sources. Comments are moderated and not immediately posted. Your email address will not be posted.

WTN Media cannot accept liability for the content of comments posted here or verify their accuracy. If you believe this comment section is being abused, contact edit@wistechnology.com.

Advertisement
Advertisement

-More Stories

WTN Media Presents